🧱 Microservices Architecture

Microservices architecture is a modern software design paradigm where applications are composed of small, loosely coupled, independently deployable services, each aligned to a specific business capability.

Info

At ConnectSoft, microservices form the core of our platform templates, SaaS offerings, and solution architecture. Each service is built with modularity, observability, and automation in mind.

---

📖 Introduction

Microservices address the challenges of monolithic systems by promoting modular, self-contained services. This results in:

• Faster feature delivery
• Team autonomy
• Flexible scalability
• Improved fault isolation

---

🧭 Key Principles

Principle	Description
Single Responsibility	One service = one business capability
Independence	Services can be deployed and scaled separately
Decentralization	Tech decisions and data ownership are local to the service
Lightweight Communication	Interact via REST, gRPC, or events

---

🔍 Characteristics

1. Loosely Coupled – Minimal dependencies between services
2. Independently Deployable – Services can evolve without global redeploys
3. Technology Agnostic – Pick the best tool/language per service
4. Scalable – Services scale horizontally on demand

---

🧩 Microservices Architecture Overview

graph TD
    User -->|API Calls| APIGateway["API Gateway"]
    APIGateway -->|Routes| Service1["Order Service"]
    APIGateway -->|Routes| Service2["Inventory Service"]
    APIGateway -->|Routes| Service3["Payment Service"]
    Service1 -->|Accesses| DB1["Order DB"]
    Service2 -->|Accesses| DB2["Inventory DB"]
    Service3 -->|Emits Event| EventBus
    EventBus -->|Dispatched To| Service4["Notification Service"]

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

🏛️ Pillars of Microservices

1. Autonomy
   • Services own their lifecycle, tech stack, and data.
2. Resilience
   • Failures in one service don’t bring down the system.
3. Observability
   • Built-in tracing, metrics, and logs help diagnose issues.
4. Security
   • Auth, encryption, and zero-trust access models.
5. Automation
   • DevOps pipelines, IaC, and GitOps practices.

---

✅ Benefits

• Agility: Smaller teams own services independently
• Scalability: Targeted scaling optimizes resource usage
• Fault Isolation: Errors are contained, improving uptime
• Tech Freedom: Teams use the right stack for the job
• Rapid Deployment: Incremental updates with lower risk
• Resilience: Patterns like retries and circuit breakers enhance availability

---

📦 Real-World Examples

🛒 E-Commerce Platform

• OrderService for order workflows
• InventoryService for stock updates
• PaymentService for transactions
• Uses event-driven architecture for async orchestration

🏥 Healthcare System

• AppointmentService for scheduling
• PatientService for medical record management
• Secure APIs for protected health information (PHI)

🎥 Streaming Platform

• ContentService for managing assets
• RecommendationService for personalization
• Implements CQRS for optimized read-write operations

---

📡 Communication Patterns in Microservices

Microservices in ConnectSoft use a mix of synchronous, asynchronous, and streaming communication styles. Choosing the right mode per interaction is critical for performance, decoupling, and resilience.

---

🔁 Synchronous Communication

🔹 Overview

• Protocols: REST, gRPC, GraphQL
• Use Case: Client-driven interactions needing immediate response (e.g., GET product details)

// gRPC call to retrieve an order
var channel = GrpcChannel.ForAddress("https://orders.example.com");
var client = new OrderService.OrderServiceClient(channel);
var response = await client.GetOrderAsync(new GetOrderRequest { Id = "ORD123" });

Tip

Use for fast, idempotent operations. Avoid chaining multiple sync calls between services.

---

📨 Asynchronous Messaging

🔹 Overview

• Protocols: RabbitMQ, Azure Service Bus, Kafka, NATS
• Use Case: Decouple workflows (e.g., process payment after order placed)

// Publish integration event with MassTransit
await _bus.Publish(new OrderPlaced { OrderId = "ORD123", Total = 299.99m });

sequenceDiagram
    participant Order
    participant EventBus
    participant Inventory
    participant Billing

    Order->>EventBus: Publish OrderPlaced
    EventBus-->>Inventory: Reserve Stock
    EventBus-->>Billing: Charge Payment

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

Info

Every ConnectSoft template supports built-in async publishing via MassTransit and NServiceBus with optional outbox patterns for delivery guarantees.

---

🌐 API Gateway Pattern

🔹 Overview

• Purpose: Single entry point for routing, authentication, rate-limiting, observability
• Tech: YARP, Envoy, Ocelot, Azure API Management

graph TD
  User --> APIGateway
  APIGateway --> AuthService
  APIGateway --> ProductService
  APIGateway --> OrderService

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🔧 Gateway Features in ConnectSoft

• ✅ Authentication & JWT validation
• ✅ Tenant & role-based access
• ✅ Request/response logging
• ✅ Custom rate limiting per endpoint
• ✅ Health check aggregation

Example

ConnectSoft's connectsoft-apigateway template provides reverse proxying, auth decorators, and OpenTelemetry middleware out-of-the-box.

---

🔄 Event Bus (Pub/Sub)

🔹 Overview

• Loosely couples services through events
• Improves scalability and testability

graph TD
    OrderPlacedEvent["OrderPlaced Event"] --> EventBus
    EventBus --> NotificationService
    EventBus --> InventoryService
    EventBus --> BillingService

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🔧 Tools Supported

• ✅ Azure Service Bus
• ✅ RabbitMQ
• ✅ Kafka (via Confluent or built-in ConnectSoft plugin)
• ✅ In-memory for testing and development

---

📶 Streaming Patterns (🆕)

🔹 Overview

• Use Case: Large-scale real-time systems: logs, metrics, AI pipelines, financial ticks
• Protocols: Apache Kafka, Azure Event Hubs, Redis Streams

graph TD
  Sensor["IoT Device"] --> KafkaTopic["Kafka:SensorData"]
  KafkaTopic --> StreamProcessor
  StreamProcessor --> RedisStore
  StreamProcessor --> AlertingService

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🧠 ConnectSoft Streaming Examples

• 📈 Observability Pipelines — ingest telemetry and publish anomalies
• 🧠 AI Enrichment Flows — stream documents into inference models
• 🚚 E-Commerce Analytics — stream user actions to a recommendation engine

Example

Use KafkaConsumerWorker<TMessage> inside a ConnectSoft worker template to build fast stream processors.

---

📌 Best Practices for Communication

Category	Practice
Synchronous	✅ Use for reads or fast-safe commands
Asynchronous	✅ Use for workflows, retries, and system decoupling
Streaming	✅ Use for real-time high-volume analytics
Event Contracts	✅ Version your messages and keep schemas backward-compatible
Resilience	✅ Wrap sync calls with timeouts and circuit breakers
Observability	✅ Trace requests across all layers using correlation IDs
Gateways	✅ Centralize auth, rate-limiting, observability

---

🏗️ Real-World Architecture Example: Event-Driven Checkout

graph TD
  UI --> API["Checkout API"]
  API --> OrderService
  OrderService -->|OrderPlaced| EventBus
  EventBus --> InventoryService
  EventBus --> BillingService
  EventBus --> NotificationService

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Sync path: UI → API → OrderService
• Async orchestration via event bus to downstream services
• Traces stitched together via correlation ID propagation

🔗 Explore Communication Patterns for detailed sync, async, and streaming methods between services.

---

💥 Resiliency Patterns in Microservices

In distributed systems, failure is not an exception — it’s a certainty. Resilient microservices gracefully degrade, recover automatically, and prevent cascading failures.

ConnectSoft’s architecture embeds resilience via retries, circuit breakers, failover, bulkheads, and chaos testing.

---

🛡️ 1. Circuit Breaker

🔹 Description

Stops repeated calls to a failing dependency after a threshold is breached.

🔧 Example (Polly in .NET)

Policy
  .Handle<HttpRequestException>()
  .CircuitBreakerAsync(
    handledEventsAllowedBeforeBreaking: 3,
    durationOfBreak: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30)
  );

graph TD
  ServiceA --> CircuitBreaker
  CircuitBreaker -->|Closed| ServiceB
  CircuitBreaker -->|Open| FallbackService

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

Warning

Always monitor open circuit duration — frequent opens may indicate service health degradation.

---

🔁 2. Retry with Exponential Backoff

🔹 Description

Retries transient failures (e.g., network hiccups) with increasing delay to avoid overwhelming services.

🔧 Example (Polly)

Policy
  .Handle<Exception>()
  .WaitAndRetryAsync(new[]
  {
      TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(200),
      TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(400),
      TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(800)
  });

Tip

Combine with jitter to avoid synchronized retries from multiple instances (retry storms).

---

🧱 3. Bulkhead Isolation

🔹 Description

Limits concurrent executions to prevent one overload-prone operation from impacting others.

graph TD
  APIRequest --> WebServer
  WebServer -->|ThreadPool-A| UserRequests
  WebServer -->|ThreadPool-B| FileUploads

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🔧 Use Cases

• Upload queue vs. user login queue
• External service access vs. background processing

Policy.BulkheadAsync(
    maxParallelization: 10,
    maxQueuingActions: 20
);

---

🔁 4. Failover & Self-Healing

🔹 Description

Redirects traffic to healthy replicas or auto-restarts unhealthy pods.

graph TD
  LoadBalancer --> PodA
  LoadBalancer -->|If PodA Unavailable| PodB

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🔧 Examples

• Kubernetes Probes: Restart failing containers with livenessProbe
• Azure Load Balancer: Redistribute traffic during zone failure

livenessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health
    port: 80
  initialDelaySeconds: 5
  periodSeconds: 10

---

🔬 5. Chaos Engineering

🔹 Description

Proactively inject faults into staging or production to verify system recovery and observability.

🧪 Examples

• Kill pod during order placement → check if retries/responses degrade gracefully
• Add latency to Kafka consumer → validate backpressure limits

graph TD
  ChaosAgent -->|Kill| InventoryService
  UserFlow --> OrderService --> EventBus
  EventBus --> InventoryService

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🧰 Tools

• Azure Chaos Studio
• Gremlin
• Chaos Mesh
• LitmusChaos

---

🔁 Combined Pattern: Retry + Circuit Breaker

var retryPolicy = Policy
    .Handle<Exception>()
    .WaitAndRetryAsync(3, i => TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(100 * i));

var breakerPolicy = Policy
    .Handle<Exception>()
    .CircuitBreakerAsync(5, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(20));

var policyWrap = Policy.WrapAsync(retryPolicy, breakerPolicy);

graph TD
  API --> RetryPolicy --> CircuitBreaker --> PaymentService

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

✅ Resiliency Best Practices in ConnectSoft

Area	Best Practice
❌ External Calls	✅ Use timeouts, circuit breakers, and retries
📥 Input Handling	✅ Validate upfront and reject malformed input early
⏱️ Backpressure	✅ Limit concurrency with bulkheads or worker queues
🔄 Fallback Logic	✅ Provide user-friendly error messages or cached responses
🧪 Chaos Testing	✅ Simulate latency, dropped messages, and failures in lower environments
🧠 Observability	✅ Monitor retry rates, circuit breaker states, and fallback execution metrics

---

🏥 Real-World Example: Appointment Booking with Resilience

sequenceDiagram
    participant UI
    participant API as AppointmentAPI
    participant Scheduler
    participant Redis

    UI->>API: ScheduleAppointment
    API->>Scheduler: CreateSlot
    alt Redis temporarily down
        Scheduler-->>Redis: Retry with backoff
    else Redis fails consistently
        Scheduler-->>Fallback: Log and notify support
    end
    API-->>UI: Confirm appointment or fallback

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Circuit breaker wraps Redis interaction
• Retry logic handles network jitter
• Fallback logs and surfaces graceful error

---

🧾 Summary: Resiliency Toolbox

Pattern	When to Use	Tools
Circuit Breaker	Failing dependency should be isolated	Polly, Steeltoe, Hystrix
Retry	Transient faults, flaky services	Polly, Resilience4J
Bulkhead	Resource protection	Polly, Kubernetes limits
Failover	Replica or instance crashes	Kubernetes, Load Balancers
Chaos Engineering	Validate real-world recovery logic	Chaos Mesh, Azure Chaos Studio

🔗 For more on Resiliency → Resiliency in Microservices

---

🔍 Observability in Microservices

Observability enables teams to understand what’s happening inside a system without shipping new code. In ConnectSoft, observability is baked into all templates — logs, metrics, traces, health checks, and dashboards are first-class citizens.

---

🧱 Core Pillars of Observability

Pillar	Description	Tools
📘 Logs	Immutable event records for diagnostics and auditing	Serilog, Fluentd, Azure Monitor
📊 Metrics	Numeric indicators for system health and performance	Prometheus, Grafana, App Insights
🕸️ Traces	End-to-end request flow across services	OpenTelemetry, Jaeger, Zipkin

---

📘 Logs

🔹 Structured Logging with Context

Log.Information("User created {@UserId} in {@Tenant}", user.Id, tenant.Id);

• ✅ Use structured (JSON) logs — not plain text
• ✅ Include context: tenantId, correlationId, operation, userId
• ✅ Do not write logs to disk in containers

📥 Centralized Logging Stack

graph TD
  Microservice --> ConsoleLog
  ConsoleLog --> Fluentd --> Elasticsearch --> Kibana

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Logs stream to stdout/stderr
• Aggregated using Fluentd or Azure Monitor

---

📊 Metrics

🔹 Custom Application Metrics

_meter.CreateCounter<int>("OrdersPlaced").Add(1, new("tenant", tenantId));

• ✅ Emit metrics for business events: OrdersPlaced, AppointmentsScheduled
• ✅ Track failure rate, queue depth, retries, etc.

🔧 Real Examples in ConnectSoft

Metric	Type	Labels
http_requests_total	Counter	method, endpoint
orders_placed_total	Counter	tenant, product
order_processing_duration_ms	Histogram	service, status

graph TD
  Service --> Exporter["OpenTelemetry Exporter"] --> Prometheus --> GrafanaDashboard

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

🕸️ Tracing

🔹 Distributed Tracing with OpenTelemetry

using var activity = _tracer.StartActivity("ProcessOrder");
activity?.SetTag("order.id", orderId);
activity?.SetStatus(ActivityStatusCode.Ok);

• ✅ Trace each inbound and outbound request
• ✅ Propagate correlation IDs through headers
• ✅ Visualize latency, failures, and dependencies

📈 Tracing View (Example)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant APIGateway
    participant OrderService
    participant BillingService

    Client->>APIGateway: POST /checkout
    APIGateway->>OrderService: Create Order (trace ID)
    OrderService->>BillingService: Charge Card (same trace ID)
    BillingService-->>OrderService: Response
    OrderService-->>APIGateway: Result

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

🧪 Health Checks & Readiness

// Minimal health check endpoint
app.MapHealthChecks("/health");

// With custom readiness logic
services.AddHealthChecks()
  .AddSqlServer(Configuration["ConnectionStrings:Orders"])
  .AddRabbitMQ(r => { r.ConnectionString = "amqp://..."; });

# Kubernetes readiness/liveness
livenessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health
    port: 80
readinessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /ready
    port: 80

---

🧭 Best Practices

Area	Practice
Logging	✅ JSON logs, correlation ID, structure over strings
Metrics	✅ Expose Prometheus-compatible metrics at /metrics
Tracing	✅ Use OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation + trace headers
Dashboards	✅ Create per-service Grafana dashboards + business KPI views
Alerts	✅ Set SLO-based alerts (e.g., 95th percentile latency > 500ms)
Environment Config	✅ Enable/disable levels and exporters via config or env vars

---

🏥 Real-World Example: Multi-Tenant Appointment Platform

graph TD
  PatientUI --> API
  API --> AppointmentService
  AppointmentService --> Redis
  AppointmentService --> EventBus

  AppointmentService -->|Logs| Serilog --> AzureMonitor
  AppointmentService -->|Traces| OpenTelemetry --> Jaeger
  AppointmentService -->|Metrics| Prometheus --> Grafana

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Tenant-aware metrics: appointments_scheduled_total{tenant="vetcare"}
• Dashboards by region and service: latency, error %, queue size
• Alerts: queue backlog > 1000, appointment confirm failures > 5/min

---

📈 Sample Grafana Dashboard Widgets

• ✅ Request Duration Histogram per service
• ✅ Top 5 Error Paths by frequency
• ✅ Orders Placed / min
• ✅ Appointment Confirmation Errors
• ✅ Active Consumers from message queues

---

📎 Summary

Pillar	Goal	Tooling
Logs	Debug + Audit	Serilog + Fluentd + Azure Monitor
Metrics	Service Health + KPIs	Prometheus + Grafana
Traces	Visualize Request Flow	OpenTelemetry + Jaeger
Probes	Health Check / Readiness	ASP.NET Core + Kubernetes Probes

Observability is not a layer in ConnectSoft — it's embedded in every template and every service by default.

🔗 For more on Observability → Observability in Microservices

---

📈 Scalability in Microservices

Scalability enables microservices to efficiently handle growing load by dynamically adapting resource usage. In ConnectSoft, all solution templates are designed with horizontal scaling, infrastructure elasticity, caching, and observability baked in.

---

🔀 Why Scalability Matters

• ✅ Ensure consistent performance under traffic spikes
• ✅ Improve cost efficiency with elastic infrastructure
• ✅ Isolate and independently scale bottlenecks
• ✅ Achieve global reach through multi-region deployments

---

🧱 Core Scalability Patterns

1. Horizontal Scaling

• Description: Add more stateless service instances (replicas).
• Best For: Web APIs, background workers, consumers.
• Tools: Kubernetes HPA, Azure App Service Scale-Out.

# Kubernetes Deployment
spec:
  replicas: 3

kubectl scale deployment orders --replicas=10

---

2. Vertical Scaling

• Description: Increase CPU/memory for a single instance.
• Best For: Stateful or legacy services not ready for horizontal scale.
• Limitation: Hard resource ceilings; reduced fault isolation.

resources:
  requests:
    memory: "512Mi"
    cpu: "500m"
  limits:
    memory: "1Gi"
    cpu: "1"

---

3. Partitioning (Sharding)

• Description: Split workload/data across logical partitions.
• Use Case: High-throughput systems like analytics, e-commerce, IoT.
• Tech: Multiple databases, Kafka partitions, tenant routing.

graph TD
  Router --> DB1
  Router --> DB2
  Router --> DB3

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

4. Caching

• Description: Store frequently accessed data in memory.
• Impact: Reduces DB load, latency, and network round-trips.
• Tools: Redis, Memcached, ASP.NET MemoryCache.

var cached = await _cache.GetStringAsync("product:123");
if (cached == null) { /* fetch + store */ }

---

5. Load Balancing

• Description: Spread incoming traffic across service replicas.
• Tools: NGINX, Envoy, Azure Front Door, Kubernetes Services.

graph TD
  User --> LoadBalancer
  LoadBalancer --> Service1A
  LoadBalancer --> Service1B
  LoadBalancer --> Service1C

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

🚀 Advanced Scaling Strategies

6. Autoscaling with Metrics (Kubernetes HPA)

apiVersion: autoscaling/v2
kind: HorizontalPodAutoscaler
spec:
  minReplicas: 2
  maxReplicas: 20
  metrics:
    - type: Resource
      resource:
        name: cpu
        target:
          type: Utilization
          averageUtilization: 70

• ✅ Scales automatically based on CPU, memory, or custom metrics
• ✅ Works with Prometheus or Azure Monitor exporters

---

7. Queue-Based Scaling

• Pattern: Decouple frontend and backend with a message queue
• Benefit: Backend workers can scale independently by queue depth

graph TD
  API --> Queue["Message Queue"]
  Queue --> Worker1
  Queue --> Worker2
  Queue --> Worker3

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

8. Multi-Tenant Scaling (SaaS)

• Options:
  • Shared database + tenant filters
  • Schema-per-tenant
  • Database-per-tenant
• Partition Strategy: Based on tenant region, size, or usage class

public interface ITenantContext { string TenantId { get; } }

---

9. Geographic Scaling

• Setup: Deploy replicas across regions
• Routing: Use DNS-based routing or Azure Front Door

graph TD
  UserEU --> EUCluster
  UserUS --> USCluster
  TrafficManager -->|Geo-based| EUCluster & USCluster

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

📊 Observability for Scaling

• 🔍 Monitor:
  • http_requests_total
  • cpu_utilization
  • queue_backlog
• 📈 Tools:
  • Prometheus + Grafana dashboards
  • Azure Monitor
  • Application Insights (for autoscale rules)

---

✅ Best Practices for Scalability

Domain	Practice
Service Design	✅ Statelessness, single responsibility
API Layer	✅ Rate limits, timeouts, and pagination
Workers	✅ Use queues and autoscale by message lag
DB/Cache	✅ Optimize queries + cache hot reads
Metrics	✅ Monitor latency, saturation, and queue depth
Cost	✅ Scale down during idle/off-hours via schedules

---

🏥 Real-World Use Case: Flash Sale Checkout

Scenario

• User traffic surges during a 1-hour promo
• CheckoutService scales from 5 → 30 pods
• Background OrderProcessor workers scale from 3 → 20
• Redis caching enabled for inventory queries

graph TD
  Users --> API --> CheckoutService
  CheckoutService -->|OrderPlaced| EventBus
  EventBus --> OrderProcessorWorker
  CheckoutService -->|Cache| Redis

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• 📦 HPA based on CPU and queue backlog
• 📈 Alerting configured for order_latency > 2s

---

📎 Summary

Pattern	Scales What	Best For
Horizontal	Stateless services	Web APIs, workers, consumers
Partitioning	Data volume	Analytics, multi-tenant apps, stream storage
Caching	Read access latency	Product catalogs, feature flags, sessions
Queue-Based	Workload decoupling	Event handling, billing, pipelines
HPA	CPU/memory/custom metrics	Any autoscalable service
Geo Scaling	User proximity	Global SaaS, regulated regions

Every ConnectSoft template is scale-out aware and includes autoscale policies, health probes, observability hooks, and support for tenant-aware partitioning.

🔗 For more on Scalability → Scalability in Microservices

---

🔐 Security in Microservices

Microservices expose many internal and external interfaces, increasing the attack surface. Security in this architecture must be comprehensive, layered, and automated.

At ConnectSoft, security is a first-class concern, built into every template, gateway, deployment pipeline, and runtime policy.

---

🧱 Core Security Pillars

Principle	Description
Zero Trust	No implicit trust — always authenticate and authorize
Defense-in-Depth	Multiple layers of security (API, network, runtime, identity)
Least Privilege	Minimize access rights to what’s strictly necessary
Isolation	Services run in isolated environments with scoped identities
Auditing	All access and security events are logged and traceable

---

🧭 Key Security Practices

1. Zero Trust Architecture

• Description: Every call, internal or external, must be authenticated and authorized.
• Practices:
  • Use JWT tokens or mTLS for inter-service authentication
  • Implement RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) and ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control)
  • Verify tenant ownership on every domain operation

sequenceDiagram
    participant API
    participant AuthService
    participant InventoryService

    API->>AuthService: Validate JWT
    API->>InventoryService: Call with token
    InventoryService->>AuthService: Token introspection

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🔗 For more on Zero Trust Architecture → Zero Trust Architecture

---

2. Secure Communication

• Description: All communication should be encrypted in transit using TLS/mTLS.
• Practices:
  • Use HTTPS for external traffic, and mTLS for internal service-to-service traffic
  • Use a service mesh like Istio or Linkerd to enforce mTLS and traffic policies

# Enforcing TLS in ASP.NET
app.UseHttpsRedirection();

# Istio Destination Rule enforcing mTLS
trafficPolicy:
  tls:
    mode: ISTIO_MUTUAL

---

3. Secrets Management

• Description: Store credentials and secrets securely using external vaults.
• Practices:
  • Don’t commit secrets to code or config
  • Inject secrets at runtime via environment variables or config providers
  • Use key rotation policies

# Inject secrets using Azure Key Vault in .NET
builder.Configuration.AddAzureKeyVault(new Uri(vaultUri), new DefaultAzureCredential());

• Tools: HashiCorp Vault, Azure Key Vault, Kubernetes Secrets (with encryption enabled)

---

4. API Gateway Security

• Description: All external traffic is routed through the gateway, which enforces policies.
• Practices:
  • Enforce OAuth2 / OpenID Connect at the edge
  • Implement rate limiting, IP allowlists, and API quotas
  • Strip sensitive headers and sanitize inputs

graph TD
  Client --> Gateway
  Gateway --> AuthService
  Gateway --> OrderService
  Gateway --> InventoryService

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Tools: YARP (ConnectSoft default), Azure API Management, Kong, Ambassador

---

5. Runtime Security

• Description: Protect containers and infrastructure at runtime.
• Practices:
  • Scan images for vulnerabilities pre-deployment
  • Use Seccomp/AppArmor profiles
  • Detect intrusion and behavioral anomalies with tools like Falco
  • Isolate containers with least privilege capabilities

# Example container security scan
trivy image connectsoft-service:latest

• Tools: Aqua Security, Falco, Trivy, Azure Defender for Containers

---

🧪 Additional Measures

Measure	What It Does
Auditing & Logging	Log security-sensitive actions with traceability
Multi-Factor Auth (MFA)	Secure user portals and admin panels
Content Security Policy	Prevent script injection in frontend UIs
OAuth Scopes	Limit access tokens to specific operations/resources
Environment Segmentation	Isolate dev/staging from production fully

---

🔍 ConnectSoft Security Highlights

• ✅ API Gateway enforcement with JWT & OIDC
• ✅ Per-tenant RBAC policies in SaaS templates
• ✅ Azure Key Vault + IConfiguration integration in all templates
• ✅ Security headers preconfigured for ASP.NET Core (X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security)
• ✅ DevSecOps pipelines that fail builds if vulnerabilities or policy violations are found

---

🧾 Summary

Area	Tooling / Practices
Authentication	OpenIddict, IdentityServer, Azure AD, OAuth2, JWT
Authorization	Claims-based RBAC, Policy-based handlers, tenant guards
Transport Security	HTTPS, mTLS, Istio, Gateway TLS termination
Secrets	Azure Key Vault, Vault, Kubernetes Secrets
Gateway	Rate limiting, input validation, logging, auth enforcement
Runtime Defense	Image scanning, container hardening, anomaly detection

In ConnectSoft, security is not optional or an afterthought — it's enforced through design, code, pipeline, and infrastructure.

🔗 For more on Security → Security in Microservices

---

⚙️ CI/CD and Automation in Microservices

Automation is the backbone of reliable and repeatable microservices operations. At ConnectSoft, everything from infrastructure provisioning to deployment, testing, and failure recovery is automated.

---

🚀 Why Automation Matters

• ✅ Eliminates manual errors
• ✅ Enables faster, safer deployments
• ✅ Improves consistency across environments
• ✅ Empowers small teams to manage complex systems
• ✅ Enables DevSecOps and Continuous Delivery

---

🧱 Automation Strategies & Tools

1. CI/CD Pipelines

• Description: Automate build, test, and deployment.
• Stages:
  • Build: Compile code, create Docker images
  • Test: Unit, integration, contract, security scans
  • Deploy: Push artifacts and release via GitOps or IaC

# Azure Pipelines YAML snippet
trigger:
  branches:
    include:
      - main

jobs:
  - job: BuildAndDeploy
    steps:
      - task: DotNetCoreCLI@2
        inputs:
          command: 'build'
      - task: Docker@2
        inputs:
          command: 'buildAndPush'
      - task: HelmDeploy@0
        inputs:
          chartType: 'FilePath'
          releaseName: 'connectsoft-api'

• Tools: Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins

🔗 For more on CI/CD → Deployment Automation in Modern Architectures

---

2. Infrastructure as Code (IaC)

• Description: Manage infrastructure with versioned templates.
• Practices:
  • Declare VMs, clusters, storage, and network in code
  • Store in Git for auditability
  • Apply changes via CLI or automation

resource appPlan 'Microsoft.Web/serverfarms@2021-02-01' = {
  name: 'connectsoft-plan'
  location: resourceGroup().location
  sku: {
    name: 'P1v2'
    tier: 'PremiumV2'
  }
}

• Tools: Bicep, Terraform, Pulumi, ARM Templates

🔗 For more on Infrastructure as Code → Infrastructure as Code (IaC) in Modern Systems

---

3. GitOps

• Description: Use Git as the single source of truth for deployments.
• Practices:
  • Commits trigger reconciliations in clusters
  • ArgoCD/FluxCD deploy desired state
  • Auditable, rollback-safe, environment-scoped

graph TD
  Developer --> PR["Pull Request"]
  PR --> GitRepo
  GitRepo --> ArgoCD
  ArgoCD --> KubernetesCluster

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Benefits:
  • ✅ Environment parity (dev/stage/prod)
  • ✅ Continuous Deployment with review gates

🔗 For more on GitOps → GitOps in Modern Architectures

---

4. Self-Healing Systems

• Description: Automatically detect and recover from service failure.
• Practices:
  • Define health/liveness probes
  • Allow Kubernetes to restart failing containers
  • Use horizontal/vertical scaling controllers

livenessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health
    port: 8080
  failureThreshold: 3
  periodSeconds: 10

• Tools: Kubernetes, Azure Monitor, Container Insights

---

5. Autoscaling

• Description: Automatically scale services based on workload.
• Example: Increase pods when CPU > 70% or queue backlog > 1000

apiVersion: autoscaling/v2
kind: HorizontalPodAutoscaler
spec:
  maxReplicas: 10
  metrics:
    - type: Resource
      resource:
        name: cpu
        target:
          averageUtilization: 70

• Tools: Kubernetes HPA, Azure VMSS, KEDA for event-driven autoscale

---

📦 ConnectSoft Templates Support:

Area	Feature
CI/CD	Preconfigured Azure Pipelines & GitHub Actions
IaC	Bicep, Pulumi, Terraform for environments and clusters
GitOps	ArgoCD-ready deployment repositories
Service Mesh	mTLS, retries, health routing with Istio or Linkerd
Observability	Logs, metrics, traces export to Azure/Grafana stack
Secrets	Built-in Azure Key Vault integration with DI and config
Testing	Integrated MSTest, SpecFlow, and Docker-in-Docker tests

---

🛠️ Full Deployment Pipeline: From Code to Cluster

graph TD
  Dev --> GitPush
  GitPush --> AzurePipeline
  AzurePipeline --> DockerBuild
  DockerBuild --> ArtifactRegistry
  AzurePipeline --> HelmDeploy
  HelmDeploy --> AKSCluster
  AKSCluster --> ObservabilityStack

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• ✅ Unit + integration tests
• ✅ Docker + container registry
• ✅ Helm chart deploys
• ✅ Observable and autoscaled

---

✅ Best Practices

Area	Best Practice
CI/CD	✅ Use multi-stage pipelines (build, test, deploy)
IaC	✅ Version IaC separately from app code; deploy via PRs
GitOps	✅ Promote via Git PRs and sync policies
Testing	✅ Automate all tests; enforce quality gates
Rollbacks	✅ Support Helm rollbacks and image pinning
Self-Healing	✅ Liveness and readiness probes + auto-restart
Secrets	✅ Inject via managed identity or Key Vault
Observability	✅ Logs, metrics, and traces exported on every deploy

---

🧾 Summary

Capability	Toolset Examples	Outcome
CI/CD Pipelines	Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions	Fast, consistent, safe deployments
Infrastructure Code	Terraform, Bicep, Pulumi	Repeatable, auditable infra provisioning
GitOps	ArgoCD, FluxCD	Deployment traceability + rollback
Autoscaling	HPA, KEDA	Load-based scaling
Healing	Kubernetes, health probes	Self-recovery from crashes

ConnectSoft templates provide end-to-end automation — from your first commit to production, with security, observability, and scalability baked in.

🔗 For more on Deployment Automation→ Deployment Automation in Modern Architectures

---

🧭 Service Discovery in Microservices

Service discovery allows microservices to find and communicate with each other dynamically, even when instances are ephemeral, scalable, or running in multiple environments.

In a ConnectSoft system, services are designed to register, resolve, and interact with other services automatically through the platform's built-in discovery infrastructure.

---

🚦 Why Service Discovery Is Critical

• ✅ Enables dynamic routing as services scale or restart
• ✅ Supports containerized and orchestrated workloads (e.g., Kubernetes, AKS)
• ✅ Avoids hardcoding hostnames/IPs
• ✅ Simplifies inter-service communication in multi-cluster or hybrid cloud environments

---

🔍 Types of Service Discovery

1. Client-Side Discovery

• Description: The client queries a service registry (like Eureka or Consul) to resolve healthy service instances, then connects directly.
• Characteristics:
  • Client must handle registry lookup + load balancing
  • Gives flexibility, but increases client complexity

graph TD
    Client --> ServiceRegistry
    ServiceRegistry --> Client
    Client --> ServiceInstanceA
    Client --> ServiceInstanceB

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Tools: Netflix Eureka, Consul, Spring Cloud Discovery
• Use Cases: Lightweight platforms or edge devices with custom routing logic

---

2. Server-Side Discovery

• Description: A gateway or load balancer queries the registry and forwards requests to the correct service instance.
• Characteristics:
  • Offloads complexity from clients
  • Centralizes routing, security, and policy control

graph TD
    Client --> LoadBalancer
    LoadBalancer --> Registry
    Registry --> LoadBalancer
    LoadBalancer --> ServiceA
    LoadBalancer --> ServiceB

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Tools: Kubernetes Services, Istio, AWS ELB, Linkerd
• Use Cases: Production systems with API Gateways or ingress controllers

---

3. DNS-Based Discovery

• Description: Services register with a DNS system, and other services resolve names to dynamic IPs via standard DNS queries.
• Characteristics:
  • Leverages existing DNS
  • Simple, low overhead
  • Built into Kubernetes (CoreDNS)

curl http://orderservice.default.svc.cluster.local

graph TD
    ServiceA --> DNS["Kube DNS"]
    DNS --> ServiceB["orderservice.namespace.svc"]

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Tools: Kubernetes CoreDNS, Consul DNS, Cloud DNS
• Use Cases: Kubernetes-native environments, scalable SaaS

---

🏗️ ConnectSoft Strategy

ConnectSoft supports all three forms, with a primary focus on server-side and DNS-based discovery, aligned with Kubernetes-native architecture:

Type	Support Level	ConnectSoft Default
Client-Side	Optional	✅ via .NET Service Discovery Abstractions
Server-Side	Full Support	✅ via Ingress + Service + Gateway
DNS-Based	Built-in	✅ via CoreDNS in Kubernetes

---

🔧 Best Practices

Area	Practice
Registration	✅ Use readiness probes and labels to mark healthy endpoints
DNS TTL	✅ Keep TTL short for fast propagation
Health Checks	✅ Enable liveness/readiness probes for dynamic removal of bad pods
Load Balancing	✅ Combine service discovery with retries and circuit breakers
Security	✅ Use mTLS or token-based auth between services
Observability	✅ Trace discovery latency and resolution failures via OpenTelemetry

---

🔄 Service Discovery Lifecycle

sequenceDiagram
    participant OrderService
    participant DNS
    participant InventoryService

    OrderService->>DNS: Resolve inventory-service.namespace.svc
    DNS-->>OrderService: Return list of IPs
    OrderService->>InventoryService: Send request to selected pod

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Kubernetes handles service registration automatically via Service objects
• Service meshes like Istio enhance this with sidecar proxies and service-level policies

---

✅ ConnectSoft Features

• ✅ Automatic DNS resolution across namespaces
• ✅ Istio-based service mesh integration for secure discovery
• ✅ Environment-based routing (dev.orderservice.svc, prod.orderservice.svc)
• ✅ Optional support for client-side lookup with DI-registered service clients
• ✅ Probes, logging, and failure fallback built into every template

---

📎 Summary

Type	Description	Best For
Client-Side	Client resolves and balances	Custom agents, low-latency control
Server-Side	Gateway or mesh resolves	Secure, production-grade workloads
DNS-Based (Kube DNS)	Use service names + cluster DNS	Kubernetes-native service calls

In ConnectSoft, service discovery is seamless, secure, and observable — and works out-of-the-box with every environment.

🔗 For more on Service Discovery → Service Discovery in Modern Architectures

---

🧭 API Gateways in Microservices

The API Gateway is the front door to your microservices. It centralizes and standardizes access by acting as a reverse proxy, enforcing cross-cutting concerns like routing, authentication, rate limiting, and observability.

In the ConnectSoft platform, gateways are pre-integrated into all service templates using either YARP (for .NET) or Azure API Management.

---

🔐 Why You Need an API Gateway

• ✅ Simplifies client interactions with backend services
• ✅ Centralizes authentication and policy enforcement
• ✅ Protects internal service topology from external exposure
• ✅ Enables observability, metering, and control at the edge

---

🧱 Responsibilities of an API Gateway

1. Routing

• Description: Forward requests to the correct microservice based on path, host, or headers.
• Example:

routes:
  - routeId: products
    match:
      path: /api/products/{*any}
    clusterId: product-service

graph TD
  Client --> APIGateway
  APIGateway --> ProductService
  APIGateway --> OrderService
  APIGateway --> AuthService

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

2. Authentication & Authorization

• Description: Validate tokens, enforce OAuth2/OpenID Connect, and inject user context.
• Practices:
  • Validate JWTs via middleware or external IDP (e.g., Azure AD, IdentityServer)
  • Enforce scopes and roles per route

services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
    .AddJwtBearer(...);

---

3. Rate Limiting & Throttling

• Description: Protect backends from abuse or DDoS via quotas and burst limits.
• Examples:
  • Limit to 100 requests per user per minute
  • Apply global or IP-based quotas

rateLimits:
  clientId:
    limit: 100
    period: 1m

• Tools: Kong, Azure APIM, Envoy, YARP + custom middleware

---

4. Request and Response Transformation

• Use Cases:
  • Convert from REST to gRPC (or vice versa)
  • Rename headers, flatten nested payloads
  • Normalize legacy service outputs

context.Request.Headers["x-tenant-id"] = tenantResolver.Resolve();

---

5. Monitoring and Logging

• Description: Capture and export telemetry to observability platforms.
• Practices:
  • Structured request/response logs
  • Export latency and status code metrics
  • Inject trace headers (x-request-id, traceparent)

sequenceDiagram
  Client->>Gateway: Request with JWT
  Gateway->>AuthService: Validate Token
  Gateway->>Backend: Forward with Headers
  Gateway->>Logging: Emit Request Log

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

6. Caching

• Description: Cache GET responses for fast access or fallback.

• Scenarios:

  • Product catalogs
  • Configuration values
  • Read-only endpoints

• Tools: NGINX cache, Azure APIM cache policies, Redis gateway caching

---

7. Load Balancing

• Description: Distribute requests across multiple backend service replicas.
• Modes:
  • Round-robin
  • Least-connections
  • Weighted routing

clusters:
  product-service:
    destinations:
      - address: http://service1
      - address: http://service2

---

🔧 Popular API Gateway Tools

Tool	Key Features	Use Cases
Kong	Plugins, service mesh, rate limiting, declarative config	Open-source gateway for hybrid clouds
Azure APIM	Built-in OAuth, caching, developer portal, policies	Enterprise-ready, Azure-native
NGINX	High-performance HTTP reverse proxy, SSL termination	Customizable at the edge
YARP (.NET)	Dynamic routing in ASP.NET Core, middleware extensibility	ConnectSoft default in .NET stacks
AWS API Gateway	Serverless-first, Lambda integration	Event-driven microservices on AWS

---

🧩 API Gateway in ConnectSoft

Default Gateway: YARP with ASP.NET Core

• ✅ JSON + JWT claims transformation
• ✅ Tenant-aware routing
• ✅ Integrated with Serilog, OpenTelemetry
• ✅ Built-in fallback & circuit breaker support

builder.Services.AddReverseProxy()
    .LoadFromConfig(Configuration.GetSection("ReverseProxy"));

Enterprise Gateway: Azure API Management

• Used in production with:
  • Subscription keys
  • GraphQL endpoints
  • OpenAPI import from microservices
  • Security policies and RBAC
  • Developer portal

---

✅ Best Practices

Concern	Practice
Authentication	✅ Validate all external traffic using JWT/OIDC
Rate Limiting	✅ Apply client, IP, or API-based quotas
Multi-Tenancy	✅ Inject tenant IDs from claims or headers
Caching	✅ Cache read-heavy GET responses near the edge
Logging	✅ Use correlation IDs, log method + status + latency
Resilience	✅ Fallback to static responses or degraded experience on error
Observability	✅ Emit gateway-level metrics and traces to Prometheus / Application Insights

---

📎 Summary

Feature	API Gateway Role
Authentication	Validate tokens, enforce scopes and roles
Routing	Direct requests to services based on path, host, or headers
Throttling	Control request volumes per client or endpoint
Transformation	Modify payloads, headers, or protocols
Logging & Tracing	Emit structured logs, metrics, and request traces
Load Balancing	Distribute traffic across service instances

In ConnectSoft, API Gateways are not optional — they are part of every microservice deployment, ensuring centralized control, reliability, and scalability at the edge.

🔗 For more on API Gateway → API Gateway in Modern Architectures

---

🛠️ DevOps Practices for Microservices

DevOps bridges the gap between development and operations by promoting automation, collaboration, observability, and reliability. In microservices, DevOps is essential for managing complexity and enabling rapid, safe delivery.

ConnectSoft integrates DevOps best practices directly into every template, ensuring that microservices are automated, observable, and production-ready by default.

---

🧱 Key DevOps Practices

---

1. Continuous Integration / Continuous Delivery (CI/CD)

• Goal: Automate build, test, and deployment pipelines.
• Practices:
  • Build Docker images on commit
  • Run tests (unit, integration, security) in pipeline
  • Automatically deploy to dev/stage/prod based on branch or PR

# GitHub Actions Example
on:
  push:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  build:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v2
      - run: dotnet build
      - run: dotnet test
      - run: docker build -t myapi .

• Tools: Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins
• ConnectSoft Default: Azure Pipelines with Helm/Kubernetes deploy

---

2. Infrastructure as Code (IaC)

• Goal: Reproducible, version-controlled infrastructure
• Practices:
  • Use Bicep, Terraform, or Pulumi to provision clusters, databases, etc.
  • Manage secrets, roles, scaling policies, and identity via code

resource aks 'Microsoft.ContainerService/managedClusters@2023-01-01' = {
  name: 'connectsoft-cluster'
  location: resourceGroup().location
  sku: {
    name: 'Standard_DS3_v2'
    tier: 'Standard'
  }
}

• Tools: Bicep (ConnectSoft default), Terraform, AWS CloudFormation
• Versioning: IaC lives alongside service code in Git

---

3. Container Orchestration

• Goal: Manage deployment, scaling, and availability of containerized services
• Practices:
  • Use Kubernetes or AKS for service hosting
  • Declare resources (CPU, memory), replicas, autoscalers
  • Use ConfigMaps and Secrets to inject runtime config

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: order-service
spec:
  replicas: 3
  template:
    spec:
      containers:
        - name: orders
          image: connectsoft/orders:v1
          resources:
            limits:
              cpu: "500m"
              memory: "256Mi"

• Tools: Kubernetes (ConnectSoft standard), Docker Swarm (optional)

---

4. GitOps

• Goal: Use Git as the single source of truth for deployments
• Practices:
  • Commit → Sync → Deploy
  • Use ArgoCD or FluxCD to watch Git and auto-reconcile desired state
  • Promote changes via PRs instead of CLI

graph TD
  Developer --> Git
  Git --> ArgoCD
  ArgoCD --> AKS

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Benefits:
• ✅ Full auditability of changes
• ✅ Simplified rollback

• ✅ Environments managed by branches

• Tools: ArgoCD (preferred), FluxCD

---

5. Monitoring and Observability

• Goal: Provide visibility into app health, latency, errors, and usage
• Practices:
  • Use OpenTelemetry to emit traces + metrics
  • Dashboards in Grafana for request rates, latency, error %
  • Alerting for SLO violations (e.g., >2% errors, 95% latency > 500ms)

services.AddOpenTelemetryTracing(builder => builder
  .AddAspNetCoreInstrumentation()
  .AddHttpClientInstrumentation()
  .AddJaegerExporter());

graph TD
  App --> Prometheus --> Grafana
  App --> OpenTelemetry --> Jaeger

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Tools: Prometheus, Grafana, Jaeger, Azure Monitor

---

🧩 ConnectSoft DevOps Stack

Practice	Default Tooling
CI/CD	Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions
IaC	Bicep (AKS, App Gateway, Key Vault)
Containerization	Docker, Kubernetes, Helm
Secrets Management	Azure Key Vault + Managed Identity
GitOps	ArgoCD
Observability	OpenTelemetry + Prometheus + Grafana
Alerts	Azure Alerts or Prometheus AlertManager

---

🧠 DevOps Best Practices in Microservices

Area	Best Practice
Pipelines	✅ Break into build/test/deploy stages
IaC	✅ Use GitOps for infra promotion via PR
Secrets	✅ Never store credentials in code or config
Rollbacks	✅ Use Helm rollback, Git tags, or ArgoCD revisions
Metrics	✅ Emit custom business metrics (orders_placed, job_duration)
CI Tests	✅ Test microservices independently using mocks/stubs
Deployment Strategy	✅ Use rolling updates or blue/green for zero-downtime upgrades
Self-Healing	✅ Use liveness/readiness probes + HPA for health and scalability

---

🏥 Real-World DevOps Workflow (ConnectSoft Example)

graph TD
  DevPush --> AzurePipeline
  AzurePipeline --> DockerBuild
  DockerBuild --> ContainerRegistry
  AzurePipeline --> HelmDeploy
  HelmDeploy --> AKS
  AKS --> Prometheus
  AKS --> ArgoCD
  AKS --> Grafana

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• ✅ CI builds, tests, and pushes images
• ✅ CD deploys via Helm or triggers ArgoCD sync
• ✅ Metrics & traces sent to observability stack

---

✅ Summary

Practice	Goal	Outcome
CI/CD	Automate build/test/deploy	Faster, safer delivery
IaC	Manage environments as code	Consistency, auditability
Orchestration	Deploy and scale containerized services	Fault-tolerant infrastructure
GitOps	Deploy from Git branches	Rollbacks and approvals built-in
Observability	Measure latency, errors, load	Alert on real-time issues

At ConnectSoft, DevOps isn't an optional layer — it's the foundation of everything we build, deploy, and monitor.

---

✅ Testing Strategies in Microservices

Testing is a critical pillar of microservice reliability. Unlike monoliths, microservices must be tested independently and collaboratively due to their distributed nature, service contracts, and async interactions.

ConnectSoft incorporates automated test scaffolds for every microservice template, supporting unit, integration, contract, and system-level tests.

---

🧪 Why Testing in Microservices Is Unique

• ✅ Multiple independently deployable services
• ✅ Inter-service communication via HTTP/gRPC/events
• ✅ Eventual consistency and retry logic
• ✅ Infrastructure dependencies (databases, queues, etc.)

---

🔍 Key Testing Types

---

1. Unit Testing

• Description: Validate a class or method in isolation
• Focus: Business logic, domain models, calculations
• Mocking: External dependencies (e.g., DB, services)

[Fact]
public void CalculatePrice_ReturnsExpectedTotal()
{
    var service = new PricingService();
    var result = service.CalculateTotal(5, 20);
    Assert.Equal(100, result);
}

• Tools: MSTest (ConnectSoft default), xUnit, NUnit
• Mocking Tools: Moq, NSubstitute

---

2. Integration Testing

• Description: Validate actual integration with DBs, caches, or other APIs
• Setup: Use in-memory or TestContainers for ephemeral resources
• Use Case: Ensure repository correctly saves and retrieves data

// Use TestServer with EF Core InMemory
var client = app.CreateClient();
var response = await client.GetAsync("/orders");
Assert.True(response.IsSuccessStatusCode);

• Tools: Microsoft.AspNetCore.TestHost, TestContainers, Docker Compose
• Databases: SQLite, PostgreSQL, Redis (ephemeral)

---

3. Contract Testing

• Description: Ensure inter-service APIs or events are backward-compatible
• Provider ↔ Consumer: Validate schema, headers, types
• Flow:
  • Consumer defines expectations
  • Provider verifies against expectations

{
  "consumer": "CheckoutService",
  "provider": "InventoryService",
  "request": {
    "method": "GET",
    "path": "/inventory/123"
  },
  "response": {
    "status": 200,
    "body": { "available": true }
  }
}

• Tools: Pact, Spring Cloud Contract, Dredd
• ConnectSoft: Pact.Net integrated with service templates

---

4. End-to-End (E2E) Testing

• Description: Validate a complete user flow across multiple services
• Setup: Run services in Docker or Kubernetes in test mode
• Use Case: Simulate placing an order → updating inventory → receiving confirmation

sequenceDiagram
    participant UI
    participant APIGateway
    participant OrderService
    participant InventoryService

    UI->>APIGateway: POST /checkout
    APIGateway->>OrderService: Create Order
    OrderService->>InventoryService: Reserve Items
    InventoryService-->>OrderService: OK
    OrderService-->>UI: Confirmation

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Tools: Cypress, Selenium, Playwright
• Mocking Strategy: Use stubs or in-memory events to isolate flows

---

5. Chaos Testing

• Description: Introduce failures in staging/CI to validate resilience
• Goals:
  • Can the system degrade gracefully?
  • Are fallbacks triggered correctly?
  • Is alerting functional?

graph TD
  ChaosAgent -->|Kill Pod| CheckoutService
  CheckoutService --> EventBus
  EventBus --> NotificationService

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• Tools: Gremlin, Chaos Mesh, Azure Chaos Studio
• Inject: CPU spikes, latency, DNS loss, dropped messages

---

📦 Test Suite Coverage in ConnectSoft Templates

Test Type	Included?	Sample Tooling
Unit Tests	✅	MSTest + Moq
Integration Tests	✅	TestContainers, InMemory EF Core
Contract Tests	✅	Pact.Net, JSON schema validators
E2E Tests	⚙️ Optional	Cypress, Selenium (Docker-in-Docker)
Chaos Tests	⚙️ Optional	Gremlin, Chaos Mesh (test profile only)

---

🧠 Testing Best Practices

Area	Best Practice
Isolation	✅ Test services independently, mock others
CI Integration	✅ Automate all tests in CI pipelines
Contract Management	✅ Version API specs and schemas; test consumer/provider expectations
Test Data	✅ Seed predictable data sets for integration tests
Coverage	✅ Track unit vs. E2E vs. contract test coverage
Chaos	✅ Schedule chaos simulations periodically or per release

---

🧪 Testing Pyramid for Microservices

graph TD
  Unit[Unit Tests]
  Integration[Integration Tests]
  Contract[Contract Tests]
  E2E[E2E + Chaos Tests]

  Unit --> Integration --> Contract --> E2E

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

• ✅ Most tests should live in the unit/integration layer
• 🧪 Fewer but impactful E2E and chaos tests

---

🏥 Example: Checkout Flow Testing in ConnectSoft

Test Stage	Action	Validation
Unit Test	CalculateTotal() in OrderAggregate	Correct total amount calculated
Integration	OrderRepository.Save()	Record stored in PostgreSQL
Contract Test	GET /inventory/{id} response structure	Matches consumer pact
E2E Test	/checkout user flow with UI → NotificationService	Confirmation is delivered successfully
Chaos Test	Kill InventoryService pod during checkout	Fallback or retry mechanism is triggered

---

✅ Summary

Type	Scope	Tooling
Unit	Single method, logic isolation	MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, Moq
Integration	DBs, queues, external APIs	TestContainers, Postgres, Redis
Contract	Consumer-provider interface checks	Pact, JSON schema
E2E	Full system journey	Cypress, Selenium, Docker Compose
Chaos	Failure resilience validation	Gremlin, Azure Chaos Studio, Chaos Mesh

ConnectSoft treats testing as a core engineering pillar — not just validation, but a tool for system confidence, automation, and evolution.

🔗 For more on Testing → Testing in Modern Architectures

---

🔄 Cross-Cutting Concerns in Microservices

Cross-cutting concerns are system-wide features and constraints that affect every service — from logging to configuration to security. In microservices, handling them consistently and centrally is essential.

ConnectSoft builds support for all cross-cutting concerns directly into its platform templates, making them composable, observable, and resilient by default.

---

🧱 Key Cross-Cutting Concerns

---

1. Logging

• ✅ Structured logging with Serilog, enriched with correlation and tenant IDs
• ✅ Centralized with Fluentd, ELK, or Azure Monitor
• ✅ Custom scopes for multi-tenant systems

Log.Information("User {UserId} booked appointment in {Tenant}", userId, tenantId);

graph TD
  Service --> Logger --> LogForwarder --> ELK

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

2. Monitoring and Metrics

• ✅ Service-level metrics (CPU, requests/sec) + business metrics (OrdersPlaced/sec)
• ✅ Dashboards in Grafana
• ✅ Alerts via Prometheus AlertManager or Azure Monitor

_meter.CreateCounter<int>("orders_placed").Add(1, new KeyValuePair<string, object>("tenant", tenantId));

---

3. Security

• ✅ Zero Trust architecture with per-request auth
• ✅ mTLS and OpenID Connect at gateways
• ✅ Token validation, RBAC, and tenant-based access enforcement

sequenceDiagram
  Client->>Gateway: JWT Token
  Gateway->>AuthService: Validate
  AuthService-->>Gateway: Claims
  Gateway->>Microservice: Authenticated Request

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

4. Configuration Management

• ✅ Environment-aware configuration via .env, Azure App Configuration, or Consul
• ✅ Feature toggles per environment or tenant
• ✅ Secrets injected via Key Vault or Kubernetes

builder.Configuration
    .AddJsonFile("appsettings.json")
    .AddJsonFile($"appsettings.{env}.json")
    .AddAzureKeyVault(...);

---

5. Tracing

• ✅ OpenTelemetry spans from edge to internal services
• ✅ Automatic correlation propagation across HTTP/gRPC/event bus
• ✅ Jaeger or Azure Monitor for end-to-end tracing

sequenceDiagram
    UI->>API: HTTP POST /checkout
    API->>Inventory: Check stock
    API->>Billing: Charge card
    API->>Notifier: Send confirmation

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

🧩 Additional Cross-Cutting Concerns in ConnectSoft

Concern	Practice/Tool
Health & Readiness	/health, /ready, Kubernetes probes
Tenant Isolation	Scoped logging, metrics, config, and secrets
API Docs	Auto-generated Swagger/OpenAPI with tenant headers
Versioning	Semantic API versions in URL or headers
Retry/Fallbacks	Polly, circuit breakers, outbox pattern
Global Error Handling	Problem Details middleware + unified status codes

---

🧠 Best Practices Recap

Area	Best Practice
Scalability	Use Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA), caching, and queue-based backpressure
Security	Enforce Zero Trust, JWT validation, RBAC, mTLS, and use external secret vaults
Testing	Apply testing pyramid: unit → integration → contract → E2E → chaos
Automation	Use CI/CD pipelines, GitOps, and IaC for consistent and reproducible deployments
Observability	Implement structured logging, emit metrics, and trace using OpenTelemetry
Cross-Cutting	Centralize logging, config, retries, and error handling using shared middleware
Configuration	Externalize configs via .env, App Configuration, or Kubernetes ConfigMaps/Secrets
Service Communication	Prefer asynchronous messaging via event bus for decoupling; add retry, idempotency
Domain-Driven Design	Structure code by bounded contexts; isolate domain models, use cases, and aggregates
API Design	Version APIs semantically, document with Swagger/OpenAPI, validate input early
Message Contracts	Use versioned DTOs/schemas for events and integrate contract testing (e.g., Pact)
Service Discovery	Use Kubernetes DNS or Service Mesh (Istio/Linkerd) for secure and dynamic routing
Health Checks	Implement /health, /ready, /live endpoints + Kubernetes probes for resiliency
Resiliency	Use circuit breakers, retries, fallback logic, and simulate failures with chaos testing
Deployment Strategy	Favor rolling updates, blue/green, or canary deployments with rollback safety
Developer Experience	Standardize templates, IDE profiles, test data, and generate API/infra scaffolding
Multi-Tenancy	Partition by tenant, isolate data, emit tenant-aware logs/metrics/configs
Documentation	Maintain internal runbooks, DevOps workflows, and self-service onboarding guides
Runtime Policies	Scan containers, restrict permissions (Seccomp/AppArmor), use read-only file systems
Release Management	Track builds/tags per environment, pin images, automate rollback in CI/CD

---

✅ These practices are codified and enforced in every ConnectSoft template — allowing teams to deliver consistent, reliable, and scalable microservices from day one.

---

🏥 Real-World Architecture Examples

---

1. E-Commerce Platform

• 📦 Handles flash sales and inventory events
• 💡 Uses API Gateway, Event Bus, and observability stack

graph TD
  User --> APIGateway
  APIGateway --> OrderService
  APIGateway --> InventoryService
  OrderService -->|Publishes| EventBus
  EventBus --> NotificationService
  OrderService --> DB1
  InventoryService --> DB2

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

2. Healthcare System

• 🏥 High compliance, uptime, and data consistency
• 🔐 Security, configuration centralization, and multi-region support

graph TD
  PatientApp --> APIGateway
  APIGateway --> AppointmentService
  APIGateway --> PatientService
  AppointmentService --> DB1
  PatientService --> DB2
  Services --> KeyVault
  Services --> Prometheus

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

3. FinTech Application

• 💰 Real-time fraud detection and transaction workflows
• 🧪 Chaos testing for resilience + secure, observable gateway

graph TD
  User --> APIGateway
  APIGateway --> PaymentService
  APIGateway --> FraudDetectionService
  FraudDetectionService --> DB1
  PaymentService --> DB2
  ChaosEngine -->|Latency/Drops| FraudDetectionService

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

---

✅ Conclusion

Microservices deliver scalability, agility, and modularity — but demand rigorous attention to cross-cutting concerns, testing, automation, and security.

With ConnectSoft, teams get an opinionated, production-ready microservices platform that abstracts the complexity and integrates everything — from observability to scaling to GitOps — right out of the box.

---

📚 References

1. Microservices.io Patterns
2. 10 Microservice Best Practices
3. Programming with Wolfgang – Microservice Series
4. Practical Clean Architecture on GitHub
5. Microservice Canvas by Chris Richardson

---