🧭 Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC)¶

The Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) is a structured framework that governs how software is planned, built, tested, deployed, and maintained.

At ConnectSoft, SDLC is not just a methodology — it's a platform-first discipline. Every template, automation pipeline, and architectural pattern we deliver is shaped by SDLC best practices, enabling developers to ship resilient, scalable, and enterprise-ready solutions.

🔍 What is SDLC?¶

SDLC defines a set of phases that guide the creation of high-quality software. It enables organizations to:

✅ Deliver predictably and iteratively
🔄 Respond to changing requirements through feedback loops
🔐 Build with security, quality, and observability by default
🚀 Accelerate delivery through automation and best-in-class tooling

🔁 SDLC Workflow¶

The SDLC is both sequential and iterative — each phase builds upon the previous one but also enables feedback and continuous improvement.

graph TD
    Requirements --> Design
    Design --> Development
    Development --> Testing
    Testing --> Deployment
    Deployment --> Maintenance
    Maintenance --> Requirements

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🧩 Phases in ConnectSoft-Aligned SDLC¶

Phase	Purpose
🧾 Requirements	Define goals and capture stakeholder needs
📐 Design	Architect solutions using modular patterns, DDD, and Clean Architecture
💻 Development	Implement features using pre-wired templates and automated standards
🧪 Testing	Validate correctness, performance, security, and contract compliance
🚀 Deployment	Use CI/CD pipelines and GitOps workflows to release with confidence
🔧 Maintenance	Monitor, adapt, and iterate through observability and structured feedback

💼 Real-World Examples from ConnectSoft¶

🛍️ E-Commerce Platform¶

Use Case: Checkout system with scalable microservices
Tech Stack: .NET, MassTransit, RabbitMQ
Deployment: Azure Pipelines + Helm + AKS
Best Practices:
- Canary rollout of new cart service
- Async event-driven order confirmation flow

🏥 Healthcare Platform¶

Use Case: Appointment scheduling and patient records
Compliance: HIPAA-ready with identity boundaries and audit trails
Tech Stack: Clean Architecture, CQRS, Blazor frontend
Observability: Serilog + OpenTelemetry → Azure Monitor/Grafana
Best Practices:
- Feature flags for rollout of new scheduling logic
- Background services for syncs and retries

💳 Fintech SaaS API¶

Use Case: Real-time fund transfers and ledger visibility
Tech Stack: PostgreSQL, NHibernate, Azure Functions
Testing: Pact for contract testing, k6 for load testing
Best Practices:
- Schema-per-tenant isolation
- API Gateway (YARP) with tenant resolution and rate limiting
- Self-healing deployments using Kubernetes liveness probes

🛠️ SDLC Tooling Ecosystem¶

Phase	Tools
Requirements	Azure DevOps, JIRA, Miro, Markdown Docs
Design	Mermaid, ArchiMate, Figma, PlantUML
Version Control	GitHub, Azure Repos, GitLab
Code Reviews	GitHub PRs, Azure DevOps PR Workflow
Build Systems	MSBuild, Nuke, GitHub Actions, Azure Pipelines
Testing	MSTest, xUnit, Selenium, Playwright, Pact, SpecFlow, JMeter, k6
CI/CD	Azure Pipelines, GitHub Actions, Helm, ArgoCD
Containerization	Docker, Podman, Azure Container Registry
Infrastructure as Code	Bicep, Pulumi, Terraform
Observability	Serilog, Prometheus, Grafana, OpenTelemetry, Azure Monitor
Documentation	MkDocs, DocFX, Swagger/OpenAPI

🌟 SDLC Benefits in ConnectSoft Projects¶

Benefit	Impact
✅ Predictability	Clear scope and milestones with measurable outputs
✅ Quality Assurance	Built-in testing layers at each phase (unit, integration, contract)
✅ Team Autonomy	Modular architecture = independent delivery
✅ Risk Management	Early feedback and observability reduce post-deployment issues
✅ Compliance & Security	Auditable pipelines, traceability, role-based access
✅ Velocity & Reuse	Templates and automation minimize boilerplate, enabling rapid iteration

🔗 From Process to Platform: Why ConnectSoft?¶

SDLC isn't just about phases — it's about building a repeatable, scalable platform for innovation. ConnectSoft brings this vision to life:

🧱 Pre-built templates for SaaS, microservices, gateways, and AI workflows
🔐 Security, testing, observability, and compliance embedded by default
⚙️ DevOps pipelines, CI/CD, and GitOps out-of-the-box
🔄 Continuous improvement supported by feature toggles, blue/green deploys, and A/B testing
🧠 Powered by Clean Architecture, DDD, and SOLID principles

You're not just implementing SDLC — you're adopting ConnectSoft’s enterprise-grade execution model.

🧾 Requirement Gathering¶

Requirement Gathering is the critical first phase of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC), establishing alignment across stakeholders, developers, and product leaders. It transforms vision into actionable artifacts that drive domain modeling, architecture, and delivery.

At ConnectSoft, we transform requirement gathering into a versioned, traceable, testable process using structured collaboration, integrated tooling, and domain-centric modeling.

🎯 Purpose¶

Define what the system must do from both business and user perspectives
Identify scope boundaries, success metrics, and stakeholder expectations
Translate ideas into stories, acceptance criteria, and domain language
Ensure outputs feed into design, testing, and CI/CD pipelines

🛠️ Tools Overview¶

Category	Tools
Backlog & Stories	Azure DevOps Boards, JIRA, GitHub Issues
Visual Modeling	Miro, Whimsical, Draw.io
UI/UX Prototyping	Figma, Balsamiq
Documentation	Markdown, YAML, Mermaid, `/Docs/Requirements/*.md`
Acceptance & Testing	SpecFlow (`.feature` files), Gherkin
Glossary & DDD	Ubiquitous Language Sheets, Context Maps

📐 ConnectSoft Methodology¶

ConnectSoft uses a DDD-enhanced approach to gathering requirements, ensuring tight integration with architecture and delivery pipelines:

Practice	Description
📄 Versioned Markdown Specs	Stored in Git (`/Docs/Requirements`) with traceable links to implementation
🧠 DDD Workshop Kit	Facilitated mapping of aggregates, bounded contexts, glossary, and flows
✅ Acceptance Criteria as Code	Specs are expressed as `.feature` files with Gherkin for test automation
🔄 Real-Time Feedback Loop	Continuous validation using whiteboards, mockups, and prototype reviews

🔁 Workflow Diagram¶

graph TD
    IdentifyStakeholders --> ConductWorkshops
    ConductWorkshops --> DefineStories
    DefineStories --> MapToContexts
    MapToContexts --> DraftAcceptanceCriteria
    DraftAcceptanceCriteria --> ValidateRequirements
    ValidateRequirements --> SyncToBacklog
    SyncToBacklog --> HandoffToDesign

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

💼 Real-World Scenario: Modular Feature Management for SaaS¶

🧩 Use Case:¶

Allow tenant admins to enable or disable specific features per subscription edition.

🧪 ConnectSoft Implementation:¶

Step 1: Story Definition (Azure DevOps)

Epic	User Story
`Feature Toggle`	`As a tenant admin, I want to enable/disable features by tenant ID.`
`Feature Plan`	`As a platform, I need to enforce available features at runtime.`

Step 2: Domain Workshop (Miro)

Identify bounded contexts: Tenant, Feature, Edition, Subscription
Model aggregates: TenantFeatureToggle, EditionPlan
Define events: FeatureToggled, EditionChanged

Step 3: Structured Specs (Markdown + Gherkin)

### FeatureToggle.md

**Glossary**
- **Feature Toggle**: A runtime switch that controls tenant-specific access.
- **Edition Plan**: A group of features bundled into a subscription offering.

**Constraints**
- A feature cannot be enabled if not included in the tenant's edition.

Feature: Feature toggle per tenant

  Scenario: Admin disables feature
    Given a tenant is subscribed to Plan A
    When the admin disables "ExportToCSV"
    Then API calls to ExportToCSV return HTTP 403

Step 4: Output for Downstream Phases

Output	Destination
`FeatureToggle.md`	`/Docs/Requirements/FeatureToggle.md`
`.feature` file	`/Tests/Acceptance/Features/FeatureToggle.feature`
Domain model stubs	`Domain/Entities/TenantFeatureToggle.cs`
API and use case headers	`Application/UseCases/ToggleFeature.cs`

📘 Integration Across SDLC¶

Phase	Reuse of Requirement Gathering Output
Design	Context maps, glossary terms, entities, use cases
Development	Specs mapped to code scaffolds, toggles, and commands
Testing	SpecFlow tests automatically generated from `.feature` files
Deployment	Feature toggles tied to infrastructure variables and config maps
Maintenance	Audit logs, rollback support, and feature status observability

✅ Best Practices at ConnectSoft¶

Model before you code: Align around domain, not UI or endpoints.
Always validate via storyboards or prototypes.
Treat requirements as executable specs — not documentation.
Version and trace: Markdown specs, .feature files, and domain models live together in source control.
Keep the feedback loop short: Regularly revalidate stories with business owners.

💡 Requirement gathering is not just the “what” — it’s the root of the “how” and the “why.”

At ConnectSoft, it drives architecture, testing, automation, and delivery.

📐 Design & Domain Modeling¶

The Design Phase turns ideas into executable architecture. It's where technical blueprints, modular boundaries, and the core domain logic are defined.

At ConnectSoft, design is not a drawing — it’s a working scaffold that maps directly to solution templates, domain aggregates, and Clean Architecture principles.

🎯 Purpose¶

Convert business needs into modular, decoupled software structures
Define entities, aggregates, value objects, and services based on domain understanding
Establish layer boundaries for maintainability, testability, and scalability
Enable direct traceability from requirement → model → implementation → test

🧠 ConnectSoft Design Approach¶

Principle/Technique	Description
🧱 Clean Architecture	Separation of concerns via domain → use case → adapter → infrastructure
🧠 Domain-Driven Design (DDD)	Model aggregates and ubiquitous language based on business rules
⚙️ Use Case Orientation	Application layer orchestrates business logic via structured use cases
📂 Templated Folder Structure	Out-of-the-box organization: `/Domain`, `/Application`, `/Web`, `/Infra`
🔁 Code-First Diagrams	Architecture visuals generated from actual structure

🧩 Architectural Layering (Clean Architecture)¶

graph TD
    FrameworksAndDrivers --> InterfaceAdapters
    InterfaceAdapters --> ApplicationUseCases
    ApplicationUseCases --> DomainEntities

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

Entities = Core domain models (no dependencies)
Use Cases = Business workflows (stateless application logic)
Adapters = Web APIs, DTOs, consumers, presenters
Infrastructure = DB, queues, cloud services (outermost)

🧰 Design Tools¶

Tool/Asset	Use Case
Mermaid & PlantUML	Visualize aggregates, layers, and flows
ConnectSoft Templates	Pre-structured Clean Architecture scaffold
Domain Model Sheets	Capture entity definitions, value objects, events
`*.feature` ↔ UseCases	Tests traceable to actual use case handlers
Architecture.md	One-pager generated per bounded context

💼 Real-World Example: Feature Management System¶

📝 Requirements Recap:¶

Enable tenants to toggle features dynamically.
Map edition plans to feature bundles.

🧠 Domain Design¶

Element	Purpose
`Tenant`	Aggregate root, owns enabled feature list
`Feature`	Value Object, describes a feature flag
`EditionPlan`	Entity, maps to pre-defined feature bundles
`FeatureToggleService`	Domain service for enabling/disabling features

Entity Snapshot:

public class Tenant : AggregateRoot
{
    private readonly List<Feature> _enabledFeatures = new();

    public void EnableFeature(string featureKey)
    {
        if (!_enabledFeatures.Any(f => f.Key == featureKey))
            _enabledFeatures.Add(new Feature(featureKey));
    }

    public void DisableFeature(string featureKey)
    {
        _enabledFeatures.RemoveAll(f => f.Key == featureKey);
    }
}

⚙️ Use Case Handler (Application Layer)¶

public class ToggleFeatureHandler : IRequestHandler<ToggleFeatureCommand>
{
    private readonly ITenantRepository _repo;

    public ToggleFeatureHandler(ITenantRepository repo) => _repo = repo;

    public async Task Handle(ToggleFeatureCommand command, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var tenant = await _repo.GetByIdAsync(command.TenantId);
        if (command.IsEnabled)
            tenant.EnableFeature(command.FeatureKey);
        else
            tenant.DisableFeature(command.FeatureKey);
        await _repo.SaveAsync(tenant);
    }
}

🔁 Design Workflow Diagram¶

graph TD
    Requirements --> BoundedContexts
    BoundedContexts --> DomainModels
    DomainModels --> UseCases
    UseCases --> LayeredArchitecture
    LayeredArchitecture --> CodeTemplates

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

📘 ConnectSoft Template Output¶

Folder	Contents
`Domain/Entities/`	`Tenant.cs`, `Feature.cs`, `EditionPlan.cs`
`Domain/ValueObjects/`	`FeatureKey.cs`, `PlanId.cs`
`Application/UseCases/`	`ToggleFeatureHandler.cs`, `GetFeaturesHandler.cs`
`Web/Controllers/`	`FeatureController.cs` (REST endpoint adapter)
`Docs/Architecture/`	`FeatureManagement.Architecture.md`, `FeatureModel.mmd`

✅ Best Practices¶

Favor composition over inheritance
Keep domain logic pure — no references to infrastructure
1 Keep use cases stateless and focused
Use interfaces and ports for external systems
Generate architecture diagrams from code to keep them truthful

💡 Good design aligns structure with intent.
At ConnectSoft, design is executable — and ready for testing, deployment, and evolution.

💻 Development & Engineering Workflow¶

With the design finalized, the Development Phase brings models, use cases, and specs to life through structured, automated, and high-quality implementation practices.

At ConnectSoft, development isn't just writing code — it's applying engineering discipline, automation, and consistency at every layer, backed by powerful templates and guardrails.

🎯 Purpose¶

Implement use cases and entities defined in the design phase
Enforce code quality, modularity, testability, and domain integrity
Integrate cross-cutting concerns like validation, logging, metrics, and feature flags
Ensure everything is CI/CD-ready and observable from day one

🧠 ConnectSoft Engineering Principles¶

Principle	Description
🧼 Clean Architecture	Ensure code follows strict layer separation
🧪 Test-First Mindset	Specs → tests → implementation → refactor
🧱 SOLID + DDD Patterns	Promote loosely coupled, business-aligned design
🧩 Templated Structure	Use standardized folder/project structure for all services
🔄 Engineering Automation	Pre-integrated CI/CD, linters, analyzers, coverage, and build validation

📂 Typical Folder Structure¶

/src
  /Domain
    /Entities
    /ValueObjects
  /Application
    /UseCases
    /DTOs
  /Infrastructure
    /Persistence
    /EventBus
  /Web
    /Controllers
    /Middlewares
  /CrossCutting
    /Logging
    /Validation
    /Metrics
/tests
  /Unit
  /Integration
  /Acceptance

⚙️ From Design to Code¶

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant Template as ConnectSoft Template
    participant UseCase as UseCase Code
    participant Tests as Tests

    Dev->>Template: Create New Microservice Project
    Template-->>Dev: Scaffolded Clean Architecture Base
    Dev->>UseCase: Implement Business Logic
    Dev->>Tests: Write Unit + Feature Tests
    Dev->>Git: Commit & Push

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🧰 Toolchain (ConnectSoft Default)¶

Category	Tools
Language & Platform	C# (.NET 8), NHibernate, MediatR, ASP.NET Core
Testing Frameworks	MSTest, xUnit, SpecFlow (Gherkin), FluentAssertions
Validation	FluentValidation + automatic middleware wiring
Logging & Metrics	Serilog + OpenTelemetry + Prometheus + Application Insights
Automation	GitHub Actions / Azure Pipelines + Nuke
Coverage & Analysis	Coverlet, CodeCoverage, SonarQube, CodeQL
Templates	`connectsoft-microservice`, `connectsoft-api-gateway`, `connectsoft-auth`

🧪 Example: Implementing `ToggleFeatureUseCase`¶

Use Case Class:

public class ToggleFeatureCommand : IRequest
{
    public Guid TenantId { get; init; }
    public string FeatureKey { get; init; } = default!;
    public bool Enable { get; init; }
}

public class ToggleFeatureHandler : IRequestHandler<ToggleFeatureCommand>
{
    private readonly ITenantRepository _repo;

    public ToggleFeatureHandler(ITenantRepository repo) => _repo = repo;

    public async Task Handle(ToggleFeatureCommand cmd, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var tenant = await _repo.GetByIdAsync(cmd.TenantId, ct);
        if (cmd.Enable) tenant.EnableFeature(cmd.FeatureKey);
        else tenant.DisableFeature(cmd.FeatureKey);
        await _repo.SaveAsync(tenant, ct);
    }
}

Validation (FluentValidation):

public class ToggleFeatureValidator : AbstractValidator<ToggleFeatureCommand>
{
    public ToggleFeatureValidator()
    {
        RuleFor(x => x.TenantId).NotEmpty();
        RuleFor(x => x.FeatureKey).NotEmpty().Length(3, 32);
    }
}

Unit Test:

[Fact]
public async Task Should_Enable_Feature_When_Valid_Command()
{
    var repo = Substitute.For<ITenantRepository>();
    var tenant = new Tenant(Guid.NewGuid());
    repo.GetByIdAsync(Arg.Any<Guid>(), Arg.Any<CancellationToken>()).Returns(tenant);

    var handler = new ToggleFeatureHandler(repo);
    await handler.Handle(new ToggleFeatureCommand { TenantId = tenant.Id, FeatureKey = "ExportCSV", Enable = true }, default);

    Assert.Contains("ExportCSV", tenant.EnabledFeatures.Select(f => f.Key));
}

🔄 Cross-Cutting Concerns¶

Concern	ConnectSoft Integration Example
Validation	FluentValidation auto-wired via middleware (`UseFluentValidation()`)
Logging	Serilog with structured JSON logs, correlation ID, tenant-aware log context
Observability	OpenTelemetry traces auto-emitted from controllers + background workers
Authorization	Policy-based or claims-based using Identity/OpenIddict
Feature Flags	Dynamic config via `IFeatureToggleProvider` + JSON/YAML switch maps
Error Handling	ProblemDetails + exception filters, status codes, retry patterns

🛡️ Quality Assurance Pipeline¶

graph TD
    Commit --> Linting
    Linting --> Build
    Build --> UnitTests
    UnitTests --> StaticAnalysis
    StaticAnalysis --> CoverageCheck
    CoverageCheck --> ArtifactPackaging

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

Each service comes with:

✅ Linting & formatting (dotnet-format, markdownlint)
✅ Static analysis (CodeQL, SonarQube optional)
✅ Test coverage gates (min thresholds for PRs)
✅ Security scanning (e.g., dotnet outdated, trivy for containers)

✅ Best Practices¶

Keep use cases stateless and focused
Write failing tests first when implementing features
Structure services into vertical slices by domain or capability
Refactor aggressively based on feedback and coverage
Automate everything: linting, testing, packaging, deployment
Track engineering metrics: PR cycle time, test flakiness, code churn

💡 In ConnectSoft, every line of code is an outcome of structure, validation, and automation.

Development is not manual — it's templated, observable, and test-first.

🧪 Testing & Quality Assurance¶

Testing in modern systems goes beyond "verifying functionality" — it is risk mitigation, design validation, and release confidence.

At ConnectSoft, testing is continuous, layered, and automated, built directly into our architecture templates, CI/CD pipelines, and development workflows.

🎯 Purpose¶

✅ Validate correctness, security, and compliance of features
✅ Prevent regressions across domains and versions
✅ Ensure system behavior aligns with requirements (specification-by-example)
✅ Empower teams to deploy confidently with observability into test results

🧠 Testing Philosophy at ConnectSoft¶

Layer	Scope	Tools & Practices
✅ Unit Tests	Classes, methods, domain logic	MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, FluentAssertions
🔁 Integration	DB, APIs, services, queues	TestContainers, WireMock.Net, SQLite
🧩 Contract	Inter-service API + event compatibility	Pact.NET, Gherkin `.feature` files, Schemas
🌐 End-to-End	Full workflows, API-to-DB/UI	Playwright, Selenium, SpecFlow
⚡ Performance	Load, latency, concurrency	k6, JMeter
🔐 Security	Static & runtime vuln detection	CodeQL, trivy, OWASP ZAP (optional)

🔁 Testing Workflow¶

graph TD
    Requirements --> FeatureSpecs
    FeatureSpecs --> UnitTests
    UnitTests --> IntegrationTests
    IntegrationTests --> ContractTests
    ContractTests --> E2ETests
    E2ETests --> CIResults
    CIResults --> FeedbackLoop

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

Each layer builds trust from the inner domain outward, ensuring fast feedback and layered coverage.

✅ Unit Testing¶

Goal: Validate business logic in isolation

[Fact]
public void CalculateTotal_ReturnsCorrectAmount()
{
    var cart = new Cart();
    cart.AddItem("book", 10m, 2);
    Assert.Equal(20m, cart.CalculateTotal());
}

Tool	Notes
MSTest	Default in ConnectSoft templates
xUnit / NUnit	Optional alternatives
FluentAssertions	For expressive assertions

🔗 Integration Testing¶

Goal: Verify behavior across system boundaries (e.g., DB, queues)

public class OrderTests : IClassFixture<PostgresTestFixture>
{
    [Fact]
    public async Task Should_Create_Order_In_Db()
    {
        var client = _factory.CreateClient();
        var response = await client.PostAsJsonAsync("/orders", new { ... });
        Assert.True(response.IsSuccessStatusCode);
    }
}

Tool	Use Case
TestContainers	DB (PostgreSQL, Redis, RabbitMQ)
WireMock.Net	Mock external APIs
SQLite In-Memory	Lightweight DB test mode

🤝 Contract Testing (API + Messaging)¶

Goal: Ensure inter-service compatibility and schema stability

{
  "consumer": "BillingService",
  "provider": "OrderService",
  "request": {
    "method": "GET",
    "path": "/orders/123"
  },
  "response": {
    "status": 200,
    "body": {
      "orderId": "123",
      "amount": 199.99
    }
  }
}

Tool	Role
Pact.NET	API contract enforcement across environments
Avro/JSON Schema	Event contract definition + CI validation
SpecFlow	Gherkin-based BDD mapping to handlers & models

🧪 End-to-End Testing (E2E)¶

Goal: Validate real user flows across modules

Feature: Checkout flow
  Scenario: Successful order
    Given I add "item1" to my cart
    When I checkout
    Then I should see a confirmation with order ID

[Binding]
public class CheckoutSteps
{
    [Given("I add {string} to my cart")]
    public void AddToCart(string item) => _cartService.Add(item);
}

Tool	Role
SpecFlow	Executable specs bound to app logic
Playwright	UI and API journey simulation (headless mode)
Selenium	Browser-based regression testing (optional)

⚡ Performance Testing¶

Goal: Validate throughput, scalability, and resource limits

import http from 'k6/http';
import { check } from 'k6';

export default function () {
    let res = http.get('https://myapi/orders');
    check(res, { 'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200 });
}

Tool	Best For
k6	Developer-centric load testing in CI
JMeter	Scenario-based performance benchmarking
Azure Load Test	Realistic simulation in cloud environments

🔐 Security & Static Analysis¶

Tool	Purpose
CodeQL	Scan source for vulnerabilities
trivy	Container vulnerability scan
SonarQube	Code quality + coverage + smell
OWASP ZAP	Optional DAST for external exposure

📊 CI/CD Test Gate Integration¶

All ConnectSoft templates come pre-integrated with:

Pipeline Stage	Description
`build.yml`	Runs unit + integration tests with coverage
`contract.yml`	Runs Pact verification and schema validation
`e2e.yml`	Spins up ephemeral app for full test suites
`loadtest.yml`	Runs k6 tests on feature branches
`coverage.yml`	Enforces thresholds (e.g., 80%+ for domain/use cases)

📈 Dashboard Example (Grafana + CI)¶

🔧 test_failures_by_module
🧪 avg_duration_unit_vs_integration
✅ specflow_pass_rate
📉 flaky_test_count (7d trend)

✅ Best Practices¶

Write tests before code for critical logic
Use .feature specs as your executable documentation
Fail fast in CI — never allow red tests in main
Automate performance and contract testing for every release
Refactor tests as you refactor code
Measure what you test — with dashboards and alerts

💡 Testing isn't a phase — it's a first-class discipline.

In ConnectSoft, testing is layered, enforced, and observable — so you can ship faster and safer.

🚀 Deployment & Release Automation¶

In modern software delivery, deployment is not a one-time event — it’s a continuous, automated, observable process that safely delivers value to users.

At ConnectSoft, every solution template includes built-in CI/CD pipelines, GitOps integration, and progressive delivery strategies, ensuring you can ship at any time, with confidence.

🎯 Purpose¶

Automate the build → test → deploy → monitor pipeline
Reduce human error and deployment downtime
Enable consistent delivery across dev, staging, and production
Support fast rollback, release toggles, and multitenant scenarios
Align delivery with metrics, alerts, and quality gates

🧠 ConnectSoft Deployment Strategy¶

Principle	Description
⚙️ CI/CD Automation	Pipelines trigger on every push, PR, or tag
🔄 GitOps	Git is the single source of truth for environments
🟩 Progressive Delivery	Canary, blue-green, or ring-based rollouts with metric feedback
🧪 Environment Parity	Dev/staging/prod share structure, config format, deployment scripts
🔐 Security & Compliance	Secrets injected securely, access scoped per environment

🧰 Tools¶

Category	Tools
CI/CD Pipelines	GitHub Actions, Azure Pipelines, GitLab CI
Infra Provisioning	Bicep, Terraform, Pulumi
Containerization	Docker, Azure Container Registry
Orchestration	Kubernetes (AKS), Helm, KEDA
GitOps	ArgoCD (preferred), Flux
Secrets	Azure Key Vault, Kubernetes Secrets, dotenv
Release Mgmt	Feature Toggles, Ring Deployments, Blue/Green via Helm

🔁 Workflow Diagram¶

graph TD
    Commit --> CI_Pipeline
    CI_Pipeline --> BuildAndTest
    BuildAndTest --> PackageArtifacts
    PackageArtifacts --> PushToRegistry
    PushToRegistry --> DeployStaging
    DeployStaging --> ManualApproval
    ManualApproval --> DeployProduction
    DeployProduction --> Monitoring

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

📦 Artifact Packaging¶

Output	Format
Docker Images	Pushed to ACR with tags
Helm Charts	Versioned in Git
.NET Packages (optional)	Published to Azure Artifacts
Documentation Artifacts	Hosted via static hosting

🔧 GitHub Actions Example: CI → Helm → AKS¶

name: Deploy Service

on:
  push:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  deploy:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v2
      - run: dotnet build
      - run: docker build -t myapi .
      - run: docker push myregistry/myapi
      - run: helm upgrade --install myapi ./charts/myapi -f values/prod.yaml

🔐 Secrets Management¶

Method	Notes
Azure Key Vault	Default in ConnectSoft templates
.NET `IConfiguration`	Inject secrets via managed identity
Kubernetes Secrets	Used for runtime env injection (e.g., connection strings)
GitHub Secrets	For pipeline usage only, never exposed to app

builder.Configuration.AddAzureKeyVault(new Uri(vaultUrl), new DefaultAzureCredential());

🔁 Progressive Delivery Strategies¶

Strategy	Description
Blue-Green	Run vNext alongside current → switch traffic after test
Canary	Release to subset of users, ramp up gradually based on health
Ring Deployments	Internal users → beta users → GA
Feature Toggles	Enable/disable features per tenant, role, or region

graph TD
    Green["Current Deployment"] --> LoadBalancer
    Blue["New Deployment (vNext)"] --> LoadBalancer
    switchTrigger["Switch Traffic"] --> LoadBalancer

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

📈 Monitoring & Observability Post-Deploy¶

🔍 deployment_duration_seconds
✅ healthz, readiness, and liveness probes
📉 request_latency_ms, error_rate, uptime per pod/release
📦 Grafana dashboards per release version or git commit SHA

🧪 Deployment Validation (Quality Gates)¶

Validation Type	Triggered When	Tool
Static Analysis	Post-build, pre-release	CodeQL, SonarQube
Test Pass Thresholds	Enforced during merge or release stage	GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps
Smoke Tests	Run post-deploy in staging and production	Playwright, SpecFlow
Alert Checks	Block deploy if error rate > 2%, SLO missed	Prometheus, Azure Monitor

✅ Best Practices¶

Keep environments identical in config and structure
Use Git for all deployment definitions (GitOps)
Deploy frequently in small batches
Treat infra and config as code
Never store secrets in code or Git
Roll back fast, monitor always, alert early

💡 At ConnectSoft, deployment isn’t a script — it’s a platform capability.

You don’t “release manually” — you ship via pipelines, probes, metrics, and approvals.

🔧 Operations & Maintenance¶

Once software is deployed, the real work begins: keeping it fast, secure, reliable, and adaptable.

At ConnectSoft, operations is not a reactive afterthought — it’s proactively embedded through observability, automation, and continuous improvement tooling. Every template is built to support day-2 operations from day one.

🎯 Purpose¶

Monitor system health, usage, and performance
Identify, alert, and respond to incidents quickly
Support change, scaling, and feature evolution post-deploy
Enable continuous optimization via feedback and telemetry
Ensure long-term maintainability and SLA/SLO compliance

🧠 ConnectSoft Operational Approach¶

Area	Built-In Support
📊 Observability	Logs, metrics, traces, probes out-of-the-box
🛠 Automation	Self-healing, auto-scaling, and scheduled tasks
📈 Dashboards & Alerts	Pre-built Grafana, Application Insights, Prometheus panels
🧾 Runbooks	Markdown-based operational playbooks in `/Docs/Ops/`
🔐 Compliance	Auditing, access controls, secret rotation
🔄 Feedback Loop	Incident tracking → retrospectives → improvement commits

📡 Core Observability Components¶

Pillar	Tooling + Output Examples
Logging	Serilog → Azure Monitor or ELK; tenant-aware JSON logs
Metrics	Prometheus (`http_requests_total`, `queue_backlog`, etc.)
Tracing	OpenTelemetry → Jaeger / Azure App Insights
Probes	`/health`, `/ready`, `/metrics`, `/liveness` endpoints
Dashboards	Grafana preloaded with service-specific boards

graph TD
    App["Microservice"] --> Logs
    App --> Metrics
    App --> Traces
    Logs --> AzureMonitor
    Metrics --> Prometheus
    Traces --> Jaeger

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🛡️ Incident Response Workflow¶

sequenceDiagram
    Monitoring->>AlertManager: Error rate > 2% on checkout
    AlertManager->>OpsTeam: Send Slack/PagerDuty alert
    OpsTeam->>Runbooks: Consult service-specific recovery guide
    OpsTeam->>Dashboards: Verify impact and dependencies
    OpsTeam->>GitOps: Roll back to last stable release (if needed)

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

📘 Runbook Template (stored in `/Docs/Ops/`)¶

# 🔧 CheckoutService - Incident Runbook

## 🔥 Common Failure Patterns
- Increased error rates
- Message queue backlog
- DB deadlocks

## 🩺 Diagnostics Checklist
- Check `/metrics` → `http_errors_total`
- Inspect Serilog logs by tenant
- Run `kubectl logs` for pod crashloop

## 🛠 Recovery Steps
1. Restart deployment: `kubectl rollout restart deployment checkout-api`
2. Roll back Helm release: `helm rollback checkout-api 12`
3. Notify SRE and update incident tracker

🧪 Maintenance Automation¶

Use Case	ConnectSoft Implementation Example
Auto-healing	Liveness/readiness probes restart failed pods via K8s
Auto-scaling	HPA scales based on CPU, memory, queue size
Background Jobs	Hangfire, Quartz.NET, or KEDA cron triggers
Log Rotation	Built-in via sidecars or log config
Secret Rotation	Azure Key Vault with scheduled key versions

🔐 Auditing & Compliance¶

Concern	Practice / Tooling
Access Control	Role-based policies per API + RBAC in K8s, GitOps, dashboards
Audit Trails	CorrelationId, tenantId, userId included in structured logs
Secret Management	Azure Key Vault, `IConfiguration`, key rotation policies
Environment Isolation	Dev/stage/prod separated by resource group, namespace, identity
Retention & Logging	Export logs + metrics with retention, alert if SLOs breached

📈 Example Dashboards (Grafana / Azure Monitor)¶

🔍 HTTP Error Rate (%) by service and status code
⚠️ Retry + Timeout Incidents over time
🔄 Queue Depth for message-based services
💰 Tenant Usage Metrics (per feature, plan, action)
📊 Latency Distribution by endpoint and region
🔒 Security Events per Day from logs

🔁 Continuous Feedback Loop¶

graph TD
    Monitoring --> Alerting
    Alerting --> Incident
    Incident --> Postmortem
    Postmortem --> JIRAStories
    JIRAStories --> Backlog
    Backlog --> FixDeployed

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

Every incident leads to a fix, a test, a dashboard, or a lesson.

✅ Best Practices¶

Treat observability as a product — with ownership, iteration, and budgets
Automate recovery — human intervention should be rare
Keep runbooks close to code — versioned with the system they serve
Monitor user impact, not just infrastructure
Respond with improvements, not just patches

💡 Operations is not about firefighting — it’s about building systems that heal, scale, and explain themselves.

At ConnectSoft, support is a built-in feature, not an afterthought.

🔁 Retrospectives & Continuous Improvement¶

The SDLC doesn’t end at deployment — it continues through feedback, reflection, and refinement.

At ConnectSoft, retrospectives are structured, repeatable, and actionable. Combined with analytics, automation, and shared ownership, they transform teams into learning organizations.

🎯 Purpose¶

Reflect on delivery effectiveness, pain points, and team dynamics
Capture insights from incidents, failed tests, delays, or rework
Convert lessons into trackable improvement actions
Close the loop from metrics → retrospectives → roadmap

🔄 Retrospective Workflow¶

graph TD
    Release --> RetroMeeting
    RetroMeeting --> ActionItems
    ActionItems --> Tracker
    Tracker --> AssignedOwners
    AssignedOwners --> Sprints
    Sprints --> NewPractices
    NewPractices --> NextRelease

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🧠 ConnectSoft Approach¶

Practice	Description
📆 Scheduled Retros	After each sprint, major release, or incident
🧾 Structured Formats	Use templates: Start/Stop/Continue, 4Ls, Mad/Sad/Glad
🧩 Data-Driven Insights	Feed in metrics (test failures, cycle time, alert counts)
🛠 Actionable Outcomes	Link retro items to GitHub/Azure DevOps stories
📂 Documentation & Sharing	Store results in `/Docs/Retrospectives/*.md`

🛠 Tools¶

Tool	Use Case
Parabol	Interactive retrospectives, async + live modes
FunRetro.io	Collaborative retro boards with voting
Azure DevOps	Track improvement stories linked to retrospectives
Grafana	Visualize engineering metrics (latency, bugs, DORA)
Markdown	Versioned retro notes stored in Git

📘 Example: Postmortem Retrospective Template¶

# 🔁 Retrospective – Checkout API Release 2.3.0

## 🧠 What Went Well
- Canary deployment prevented outage for majority of users
- Unit test coverage improved from 78% → 91%

## 😬 What Didn’t Go Well
- Load testing missed spike in export feature
- 2 SLO alerts triggered during first 10 minutes

## 📈 Data
- Errors: 103 (vs. <50 SLO)
- Mean latency: 820ms (target: <500ms)

## ✅ Action Items
- [ ] Add export flow to performance test suite
- [ ] Set up alert for Redis connection saturation
- [ ] Document spike mitigation in runbook

📊 ConnectSoft Metrics to Track¶

Area	Sample Metrics / Questions
💻 Dev Velocity	Lead time, cycle time, PR wait time, #hotfixes
🧪 Test Quality	Flaky tests, failed test count, time-to-repair
🧯 Incidents	MTTR, open incidents per service, severity levels
🚚 Delivery Flow	Deploy frequency, rollback rate, failed deployments
🧠 Learning	% of action items completed, repeated issues flagged

📈 Engineering Dashboards to Support Retros¶

📊 DORA Metrics: Deployment frequency, lead time, MTTR, change fail %
⚠️ Alert Fatigue Index: Unacknowledged alerts vs. resolved alerts
✅ Test Coverage by Layer: Unit / Integration / Acceptance
🛠 Retro Trends: Tag themes over time (e.g., infra, testing, knowledge gaps)

🔄 Examples of Improvements After Retros¶

Problem Observed	ConnectSoft Practice Introduced
Load spikes missed during QA	Added k6 simulations into CI and Canary rollout criteria
Feature toggle confusion per tenant	Introduced toggle audit + UI visibility by tenant ID
Error correlation unclear across systems	Implemented OpenTelemetry correlation ID propagation
Delays in staging deployment	Added PR-based auto-preview environments using GitHub Actions

✅ Best Practices¶

Make retrospectives non-negotiable — even after successful releases
Focus on systems, not people — solve root causes, not blame symptoms
Track and review action item closure regularly
Correlate feedback with metrics to prioritize the biggest gains
Capture wins too — reinforce what works

💡 At ConnectSoft, every delivery is a data point, every failure is a lesson, and every improvement is version-controlled.

Continuous improvement is part of your architecture.

🔚 End of SDLC Core Phases → You can now build, deploy, and evolve your platform with ConnectSoft confidence.

🧪 Full Example: Feature Management System in a Multi-Tenant SaaS Platform¶

This example demonstrates how ConnectSoft teams use the SDLC to deliver a new feature:
➡️ Tenant-specific Feature Toggles and Edition Plans

📋 Business Requirement¶

“Tenant admins need to enable or disable specific features for users, based on their subscription plan.”

🧭 Lifecycle Walkthrough¶

1. 🧾 Requirement Gathering¶

Workshop with product, architecture, and customer success

Defined user stories in Azure Boards:

As a tenant admin, I want to disable specific features so that users can't access them.

Glossary terms: Edition, FeatureToggle, Tenant, FeatureBundle
Markdown spec in /Docs/Requirements/FeatureToggle.md
Acceptance criteria in .feature files

2. 📐 Design & Modeling¶

Identified aggregate: TenantFeatureToggle
Modeled bounded contexts: Tenant, Feature, Edition
Created Clean Architecture structure using ConnectSoft template
Designed use case: ToggleFeatureCommandHandler.cs

3. 💻 Development¶

Implemented domain entities:

public class Tenant { List<Feature> EnabledFeatures { get; set; } }

Application logic inside MediatR handler
Feature toggle validation using FluentValidation
All changes committed via GitHub using feature branch workflow

4. 🧪 Testing¶

Unit tests for entity behavior and handler logic (xUnit + FluentAssertions)
Integration tests with PostgreSQL via TestContainers
SpecFlow .feature specs auto-bound to use case code
Contract tests using Pact.NET for downstream systems

5. 🚀 Deployment¶

CI: GitHub Actions pipeline runs all tests + coverage checks
CD: Helm chart deploys service to AKS
GitOps: ArgoCD watches main branch and syncs to cluster
Secrets: Azure Key Vault used for DB/auth config
Canary rollout with traffic split 10% → 50% → 100% + alert-based gating

6. 🔧 Operations & Observability¶

Logging: Serilog structured logs w/ correlation & tenant context
Metrics: Prometheus features_toggled_total per tenant
Tracing: OpenTelemetry from HTTP → handler → DB → event bus
Health probes: /ready, /health, /metrics enabled by default

7. 🔁 Retrospective & Feedback Loop¶

Load spike discovered on toggle change (cache invalidation)
Added Redis invalidation logic and new performance test scenario
Action items:
Add load test
Improve feature-toggle latency monitoring
Tracked via Azure DevOps retrospective task board

📊 SDLC Lifecycle Diagram (ConnectSoft Implementation)¶

graph TD
    Req[Requirement Gathering] --> Design
    Design --> Dev[Development]
    Dev --> Test[Testing]
    Test --> Deploy[Deployment]
    Deploy --> Ops[Operations & Monitoring]
    Ops --> Retro[Retrospective & Feedback]
    Retro --> Req

Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

Each phase creates outputs reused by the next:
✅ Stories → Models → Use Cases → Tests → Pipelines → Probes → Lessons → Stories

✅ Conclusion: Key Takeaways¶

Category	Insight
🧱 Structured Approach	Each phase of SDLC adds purpose-built artifacts that flow into the next
🔁 Continuous Feedback	Retrospectives + metrics drive improvement and architectural evolution
🧩 Reuse and Traceability	Specs, code, and tests are linked — enabling confidence and compliance
🔒 Security & Observability	ConnectSoft treats them as defaults, not add-ons
⚙️ Automation Everywhere	From pipelines to metrics to testing and rollback

✅ ConnectSoft turns SDLC from a theory into an execution engine — powered by structure, code, and team discipline.

🧭 Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC)¶

🔍 What is SDLC?¶

🔁 SDLC Workflow¶

🧩 Phases in ConnectSoft-Aligned SDLC¶

💼 Real-World Examples from ConnectSoft¶

🛍️ E-Commerce Platform¶

🏥 Healthcare Platform¶

💳 Fintech SaaS API¶

🛠️ SDLC Tooling Ecosystem¶

🌟 SDLC Benefits in ConnectSoft Projects¶

🔗 From Process to Platform: Why ConnectSoft?¶

🧾 Requirement Gathering¶

🎯 Purpose¶

🛠️ Tools Overview¶

📐 ConnectSoft Methodology¶

🔁 Workflow Diagram¶

💼 Real-World Scenario: Modular Feature Management for SaaS¶

🧩 Use Case:¶

🧪 ConnectSoft Implementation:¶

📘 Integration Across SDLC¶

✅ Best Practices at ConnectSoft¶

📐 Design & Domain Modeling¶

🎯 Purpose¶

🧠 ConnectSoft Design Approach¶

🧩 Architectural Layering (Clean Architecture)¶

🧰 Design Tools¶

💼 Real-World Example: Feature Management System¶

📝 Requirements Recap:¶

🧠 Domain Design¶

⚙️ Use Case Handler (Application Layer)¶

🔁 Design Workflow Diagram¶

📘 ConnectSoft Template Output¶

✅ Best Practices¶

💻 Development & Engineering Workflow¶

🎯 Purpose¶

🧠 ConnectSoft Engineering Principles¶

📂 Typical Folder Structure¶

⚙️ From Design to Code¶

🧰 Toolchain (ConnectSoft Default)¶

🧪 Example: Implementing ToggleFeatureUseCase¶

🔄 Cross-Cutting Concerns¶

🛡️ Quality Assurance Pipeline¶

✅ Best Practices¶

🧪 Testing & Quality Assurance¶

🎯 Purpose¶

🧠 Testing Philosophy at ConnectSoft¶

🔁 Testing Workflow¶

✅ Unit Testing¶

🔗 Integration Testing¶

🤝 Contract Testing (API + Messaging)¶

🧪 End-to-End Testing (E2E)¶

⚡ Performance Testing¶

🔐 Security & Static Analysis¶

📊 CI/CD Test Gate Integration¶

📈 Dashboard Example (Grafana + CI)¶

✅ Best Practices¶

🚀 Deployment & Release Automation¶

🎯 Purpose¶

🧠 ConnectSoft Deployment Strategy¶

🧰 Tools¶

🔁 Workflow Diagram¶

📦 Artifact Packaging¶

🔧 GitHub Actions Example: CI → Helm → AKS¶

🔐 Secrets Management¶

🔁 Progressive Delivery Strategies¶

📈 Monitoring & Observability Post-Deploy¶

🧪 Deployment Validation (Quality Gates)¶

✅ Best Practices¶

🔧 Operations & Maintenance¶

🎯 Purpose¶

🧠 ConnectSoft Operational Approach¶

📡 Core Observability Components¶

🛡️ Incident Response Workflow¶

📘 Runbook Template (stored in /Docs/Ops/)¶

🧪 Maintenance Automation¶

🔐 Auditing & Compliance¶

📈 Example Dashboards (Grafana / Azure Monitor)¶

🔁 Continuous Feedback Loop¶

✅ Best Practices¶

🔁 Retrospectives & Continuous Improvement¶

🧪 Example: Implementing `ToggleFeatureUseCase`¶

📘 Runbook Template (stored in `/Docs/Ops/`)¶