πͺ API Gateway In Modern Systems¶
The API Gateway acts as the central entry point into distributed systems within the ConnectSoft platform. It routes client requests to appropriate backend services, handles authentication and tenant resolution, and applies essential cross-cutting concerns such as logging, rate limiting, observability, and security enforcement.
Info
In ConnectSoft, the API Gateway is a dedicated standalone solution template.
It is not based on YARP or Envoy, but rather a custom-coded .NET Core gateway, designed from the ground up to support multi-tenant SaaS platforms, enterprise service boundaries, and AI-ready ecosystems.
There are additional templates based on YARP and Envoy, but they are not the focus of this document.
It is a self-contained reverse proxy that supports routing, policy injection, JWT validation, observability, and more β all baked in.
π§ Overview¶
Modern microservices and SaaS platforms require a layer of indirection between public clients and internal service implementations.
The API Gateway pattern solves this by acting as a faΓ§ade that centralizes external access and applies reusable middleware logic β improving maintainability, security, and runtime transparency.
The ConnectSoft API Gateway provides:
- β Centralized routing for REST and gRPC services
- π Authentication and multi-tenant authorization
- π Request transformation and header rewriting
- π Observability via OpenTelemetry and Serilog
- π Rate limiting and circuit breaker patterns
- π§ Custom logic injection via middleware pipeline
π Why It Matters¶
Without a gateway, client applications must:
- Know the address of every microservice
- Handle authorization and rate limits independently
- Replicate error handling, health checks, and retry logic
- Be tightly coupled to the backend architecture
The ConnectSoft API Gateway decouples all of this with a unified, programmable interface.
| Concern | Without Gateway | With ConnectSoft Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Authentication | Implemented separately per service | Centralized via JWT/OIDC |
| Rate Limiting | Difficult to coordinate | Built-in and configurable |
| Routing | Static URLs or hardcoded service discovery | Dynamic config or service discovery-aware |
| TLS Termination | Per-service certificates | Central TLS at the gateway |
| Observability | Fragmented across services | Unified via tracing, metrics, and logs |
| Multi-Tenancy | Spread across services | Enforced via tenant-aware policies and guards |
π§± Position in Architecture¶
The gateway is deployed at the edge of the system, interfacing with clients, internal APIs, and identity infrastructure.
graph TD
Client["User / Mobile / Bot"] --> Gateway["API Gateway (Custom Template)"]
Gateway --> AuthService["Identity Service"]
Gateway --> ProductService["Product Service"]
Gateway --> OrderService["Order Service"]
Gateway --> NotificationService["Notification Service"]
Gateway --> Observability["OpenTelemetry / Serilog / Metrics"]
Tip
The ConnectSoft gateway is multi-protocol. It can route HTTP/REST, gRPC, and websocket requests, and integrates with upstream services via direct endpoints or service discovery (in Kubernetes or container platforms).
π§° Core Technology¶
| Component | Purpose |
|---|---|
| .NET Core Gateway App | Fully custom, extensible reverse proxy |
| Built-in Middleware | Routing, auth, tenant filters, tracing, logging |
| OpenTelemetry | Distributed tracing + metrics export |
| Serilog | Structured JSON logging with tenant-aware enrichment |
| Pulumi or Terraform | Deployment via infrastructure-as-code |
| Docker/Kubernetes | Containerized and scalable deployment ready |
π Gateway Template Highlights¶
- Comes pre-wired with:
RequestRoutingMiddlewareJwtValidationMiddlewareTenantContextResolverObservabilityEnricherMiddlewareCorrelationIdHandler- Designed to work with ConnectSoft microservices, OpenIddict-based auth, and message brokers.
π§© Related Concepts¶
π Core Responsibilities of the API Gateway¶
The ConnectSoft API Gateway is more than just a traffic router β it applies centralized logic to manage requests, enforce contracts, and direct traffic with resilience and intelligence.
π§ Key Functional Areas¶
| Feature Area | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Routing | Direct traffic to backend services via path, host, header, or method rules |
| Request Transformation | Modify headers, paths, or payloads for compatibility or security |
| Load Balancing | Distribute requests across service replicas |
| Service Aggregation | Combine multiple backend responses into one (for faΓ§ade APIs) |
| Fallback / Retry | Handle failures gracefully with retry/circuit breaker patterns |
| Protocol Bridging | Route between REST, gRPC, WebSocket, and event-driven systems |
π¦ Dynamic Routing¶
The gateway supports path-based, host-based, and header-based routing rules.
app.UseEndpoints(endpoints =>
{
endpoints.MapReverseProxy(proxyPipeline =>
{
proxyPipeline.Use((context, next) =>
{
var route = RouteResolver.Resolve(context);
context.Items["UpstreamRoute"] = route;
return next(context);
});
proxyPipeline.UseMiddleware<AuthenticationMiddleware>();
proxyPipeline.UseMiddleware<TenantContextMiddleware>();
proxyPipeline.UseMiddleware<ObservabilityEnricherMiddleware>();
});
});
Example: Path-Based Routing Logic
if (path.StartsWith("/api/products"))
return "product-service";
else if (path.StartsWith("/api/orders"))
return "order-service";
graph TD
Client --> Gateway
Gateway -->|/api/products/*| ProductService
Gateway -->|/api/orders/*| OrderService
Tip
Routing can also support subdomain-based separation or multi-versioning via query, headers, or path segments.
π Request and Response Transformation¶
The gateway enables centralized transformation of:
- π Paths: Rewriting
/api/v1/productsβ/products - πͺͺ Headers: Injecting
X-Tenant-Id,X-Correlation-Id, or removing sensitive headers - π Payloads: Optional rewriting (e.g., to comply with backend schema)
context.Request.Headers["X-Tenant-Id"] = tenantContext.TenantId;
context.Response.OnStarting(() =>
{
context.Response.Headers["X-Processed-By"] = "ConnectSoft Gateway";
return Task.CompletedTask;
});
Info
Centralized transformation logic reduces duplication and keeps backend services lean and focused on business logic.
βοΈ Load Balancing & Resilience¶
When routing to internal services, the gateway supports:
- Weighted round-robin or random selection
- Integration with service registries (via abstraction)
- Passive health check fallback (e.g., service instance unavailability)
graph TD
Gateway -->|LB| ProductServiceA
Gateway -->|LB| ProductServiceB
var upstreams = _serviceRegistry.GetHealthyInstances("order-service");
var target = _loadBalancer.Select(upstreams);
context.ForwardTo(target);
Tip
Load balancing logic is pluggable and tenant-aware. You can implement custom strategies based on user tier, edition, or SLA.
π§© Service Composition (Facade APIs)¶
For complex clients (e.g., mobile apps), the gateway can:
- Compose multiple service calls into one aggregated response
- Apply custom shaping for frontend needs
Example: Compose User Profile
var user = await _userService.GetUser(id);
var subscriptions = await _subscriptionService.GetByUser(id);
return new UserProfileDto(user, subscriptions);
graph TD
Client --> Gateway
Gateway --> UserService
Gateway --> SubscriptionService
Gateway -->|Aggregates| Client
Warning
Use composition sparingly β gateways should avoid becoming brittle or violating service boundaries. Favor BFF (Backend for Frontend) patterns for tightly coupled UIs.
π‘ Best Practices¶
| Practice | Description |
|---|---|
| β Keep routes versioned | Use /v1/, /v2/ or headers to support evolution |
| β Inject correlation & tenant headers | Enable observability and tenancy enforcement downstream |
| β Strip unsafe headers | Remove headers like Authorization or X-Forwarded-For unless needed |
| β Compose smartly | Avoid overloading gateway with complex business logic |
| β Prefer contracts over reflection | Define routes and services explicitly in configs or middleware |
π Security and Access Control¶
Security is a core function of the API Gateway in any distributed architecture.
In ConnectSoft, the API Gateway acts as the primary security perimeter, enforcing identity, access, and tenant boundaries before any request reaches downstream services.
Info
The ConnectSoft Gateway is pre-integrated with OpenIddict (or other external OIDC providers), allowing seamless validation of access tokens and injection of tenant and identity context into the request pipeline.
π‘οΈ JWT Validation (OAuth2 / OIDC)¶
All external requests must include a valid bearer token. The gateway verifies:
- Signature validity
- Expiration (
exp) - Audience (
aud) and issuer (iss) - Required scopes and roles
- Tenant claims
Example: JWT Middleware Extractor
services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddJwtBearer(options =>
{
options.Authority = Configuration["Auth:Authority"];
options.Audience = "connectsoft-api";
options.TokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters
{
ValidateIssuer = true,
ValidIssuer = "https://identity.connectsoft.io",
RoleClaimType = "role",
NameClaimType = "name"
};
});
Tip
Tokens can be issued via OpenIddict, Azure AD, Okta, or any compliant OIDC provider. The Gateway is fully pluggable.
π§© Multi-Tenant Authorization¶
The ConnectSoft Gateway automatically resolves tenant context from:
- Token claims (
tenant_id) - Subdomain or header (
x-tenant-id) - Route parameter or query string (fallback)
public class TenantContextMiddleware
{
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context, RequestDelegate next)
{
var tenantId = context.User.FindFirst("tenant_id")?.Value
?? context.Request.Headers["X-Tenant-Id"].FirstOrDefault();
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(tenantId))
throw new UnauthorizedAccessException("Missing tenant context");
context.Items["TenantContext"] = new TenantContext(tenantId);
await next(context);
}
}
Tenant context is then injected into:
X-Tenant-Idheader to downstream services- Correlation IDs
- Logs and OpenTelemetry spans
π Scope & Role Enforcement¶
Requests are validated against required roles or scopes per route.
Example: Role/Scope Policy Enforcement
if (!context.User.IsInRole("admin") && !context.User.HasScope("orders:write"))
{
context.Response.StatusCode = 403;
await context.Response.WriteAsync("Forbidden");
return;
}
Recommended Scope Format:
- users:read, users:write
- orders:read, orders:admin
- tenant:manage, audit:view
# Declarative route metadata (optional future extension)
routes:
- path: /api/orders
requiredScopes:
- orders:read
- orders:write
requiredRoles:
- user
- admin
π Propagating Security Context¶
Once the request is validated, the gateway forwards:
X-User-IdX-Tenant-IdX-ScopesX-Request-Id
This allows downstream services to make access decisions without revalidating tokens.
sequenceDiagram
Client->>Gateway: Bearer Token
Gateway->>AuthService: Token Validation
AuthService-->>Gateway: Claims (userId, tenantId, scopes)
Gateway->>ProductService: Forwarded request with headers
π§Ό Input Filtering & Header Sanitization¶
To prevent injection, spoofing, or header pollution:
- β Strip
X-Forwarded-For,Authorization,Cookieunless explicitly whitelisted - β
Inject known headers under safe names (
X-User-Id,X-Tenant-Id) - β Reject unknown content types and large payloads
- β Use model binding + schema validation in downstream services
Example: Header Sanitizer Middleware
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context, RequestDelegate next)
{
var forbiddenHeaders = new[] { "Authorization", "Cookie", "X-Forwarded-For" };
foreach (var h in forbiddenHeaders)
context.Request.Headers.Remove(h);
await next(context);
}
π‘οΈ Rate Limiting and Abuse Protection¶
Basic request throttling is built-in using an in-memory or distributed counter (Redis recommended).
Example: IP + Token Throttling
if (_rateLimiter.IsLimitExceeded(userId, path))
{
context.Response.StatusCode = 429;
await context.Response.WriteAsync("Rate limit exceeded");
return;
}
| Tier | Limit |
|---|---|
| Free Tier | 100 requests / 5 minutes |
| Paid Tier | 1000 requests / 1 minute |
| Internal Bots | Unlimited (token scoped) |
Warning
Always throttle unauthenticated routes (e.g. /health, /public) by IP or subnet.
π Auditing & Compliance¶
Every request through the gateway can be logged:
- Endpoint, user, tenant
- Correlation ID
- IP, User-Agent, token fingerprint
- Scope and authorization decision
Example: Serilog Template
Log.ForContext("UserId", userId)
.ForContext("TenantId", tenantId)
.ForContext("Route", context.Request.Path)
.Information("API request handled");
β Security Best Practices¶
| Practice | Description |
|---|---|
| β Use token expiration (short-lived JWTs) | Avoid long-term credentials |
| β Strip unsafe headers | Remove unknown or sensitive headers before forwarding |
| β Propagate trace and tenant headers | Enable distributed observability and policy enforcement |
| β Validate request schema | Use JSON Schema or typed DTOs to prevent injection |
| β Monitor auth failures | Alert on spikes in 401 or 403 responses |
| β Encrypt traffic | Use HTTPS + TLS 1.2+ termination at the edge |
π Observability and Resilience¶
A production-grade API Gateway must do more than route traffic β it must enable full insight into system behavior and gracefully handle failures when things go wrong.
At ConnectSoft, the gateway provides built-in telemetry, resilience policies, health checks, and diagnostic propagation out of the box.
π§Ύ Structured Logging (Serilog)¶
All incoming and outgoing traffic is logged with:
- Timestamp, method, route
- Tenant ID, User ID (when authenticated)
- Correlation ID (tracing)
- Status code, latency, source IP
Log.ForContext("TenantId", tenantId)
.ForContext("UserId", userId)
.ForContext("RequestId", context.TraceIdentifier)
.Information("Handled {Method} {Path}", method, path);
Logs are output in JSON format, ready for ingestion into:
- Azure Monitor
- Elastic Stack (Fluentd β Elasticsearch β Kibana)
- Seq, Datadog, Grafana Loki
Tip
Every ConnectSoft template includes log enrichment for X-Tenant-Id, X-Correlation-Id, and operation context.
πΈοΈ Distributed Tracing (OpenTelemetry)¶
The gateway acts as a trace root for every request and propagates tracing headers downstream:
traceparent(W3C standard)X-Request-IDX-Correlation-ID
using var activity = _activitySource.StartActivity("Gateway Request", ActivityKind.Server);
activity?.SetTag("http.route", context.Request.Path);
activity?.SetTag("tenant.id", tenantId);
activity?.SetTag("user.id", userId);
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Gateway
participant OrderService
participant BillingService
Client->>Gateway: Request with trace headers
Gateway->>OrderService: Forward with propagated traceparent
OrderService->>BillingService: Downstream trace
Traces are exported to:
- Azure Application Insights
- Jaeger
- Zipkin
- Tempo (Grafana)
π Metrics (Prometheus-compatible)¶
The gateway exposes /metrics for:
| Metric | Description |
|---|---|
http_requests_total |
Count of requests per route/method |
http_request_duration_seconds |
Histogram of request times |
http_auth_failures_total |
Auth/authorization failure counts |
http_tenant_resolution_failures |
Invalid or missing tenant errors |
_meter.CreateCounter<long>("http_requests_total")
.Add(1, new Tag("route", context.Request.Path), new Tag("method", method));
Info
Metrics can be scraped by Prometheus, visualized in Grafana, and used for alerting and SLO tracking.
π Health Checks & Readiness¶
The gateway provides endpoints for:
/healthβ Liveness probe/readyβ Readiness for upstream services
app.MapHealthChecks("/health");
app.MapHealthChecks("/ready", new HealthCheckOptions
{
Predicate = r => r.Tags.Contains("ready")
});
Upstream probes: The gateway checks the availability of critical dependencies (e.g., IdentityService, Redis, MetricsSink) and exposes status.
graph TD
Gateway --> IdentityService
Gateway --> RedisCache
Gateway --> TelemetrySink
Warning
Always tag readiness checks with ready so that Kubernetes or your orchestrator can gracefully drain connections on shutdown.
π Retry & Circuit Breaker Policies¶
To protect against transient failures and overloaded services, the gateway includes:
- β± Retry on timeouts, 502/503/504
- π Circuit breaker on repeated failures
- π Exponential backoff with jitter
Example: Retry with Polly
var retryPolicy = Policy
.Handle<Exception>()
.WaitAndRetryAsync(new[]
{
TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(100),
TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(250),
TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(500)
});
Example: Circuit Breaker
Combined policy:
var resiliencePolicy = Policy.WrapAsync(retryPolicy, circuitBreaker);
await resiliencePolicy.ExecuteAsync(() => _proxy.ForwardAsync(...));
graph TD
Gateway --> RetryPolicy --> CircuitBreaker --> ProductService
π Graceful Degradation & Fallbacks¶
In the event of critical failures, fallback logic can be added:
try
{
await _proxy.ForwardAsync(context);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Log.Error(ex, "Upstream failure");
context.Response.StatusCode = 503;
await context.Response.WriteAsync("Service temporarily unavailable");
}
You can optionally:
- Serve stale cache
- Return synthetic response
- Redirect to failover instance
β Best Practices for Observability and Resilience¶
| Practice | Description |
|---|---|
| β Always use correlation and trace IDs | Required for debugging distributed transactions |
| β Collect Prometheus-compatible metrics | Enables SLO monitoring and alerting |
| β Log in structured format | Supports search, filtering, and analysis |
| β Retry idempotent calls only | Avoid retrying unsafe POST/PUTs unless designed to tolerate it |
| β Use circuit breakers per backend | Prevent cascading failure from a single service |
| β Expose liveness and readiness probes | Required for container orchestration |
π Deployment and Extensibility¶
The ConnectSoft API Gateway is designed to be infrastructure-agnostic and easily deployed across:
- β Cloud (Azure, AWS, GCP)
- π³ Containerized environments (Docker, Kubernetes, AKS)
- π’ On-premise or hybrid setups
Its extensibility model enables developers to inject custom middleware for authentication, tracing, tenant resolution, metrics, or business logic.
π Environment Configuration¶
The gateway supports layered configuration through:
appsettings.jsonappsettings.{Environment}.json- Environment variables (e.g., Docker, Kubernetes ConfigMaps)
- Secret injection (e.g., Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault)
Example: Configuration Structure
/config
appsettings.json
appsettings.Development.json
appsettings.Production.json
/secrets
vault-secrets.json
Sample appsettings.Production.json
{
"Auth": {
"Authority": "https://identity.connectsoft.io",
"Audience": "connectsoft-api"
},
"Observability": {
"EnableTracing": true,
"Exporter": "AzureMonitor"
},
"RateLimiting": {
"Free": 100,
"Paid": 1000
}
}
π³ Docker-Based Deployment¶
A prebuilt Dockerfile is provided in the gateway template:
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:8.0
WORKDIR /app
COPY . .
EXPOSE 5000
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "ConnectSoft.Gateway.dll"]
Run locally:
docker build -t connectsoft-gateway .
docker run -e ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT=Production -p 5000:5000 connectsoft-gateway
βΈοΈ Kubernetes (AKS) Deployment¶
The gateway is Kubernetes-native, exposing liveness/readiness probes and supporting autoscaling.
Helm chart example:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: connectsoft-gateway
spec:
replicas: 3
containers:
- name: gateway
image: registry/connectsoft-gateway:latest
ports:
- containerPort: 5000
readinessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /ready
port: 5000
livenessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health
port: 5000
Horizontal scaling via HPA:
apiVersion: autoscaling/v2
kind: HorizontalPodAutoscaler
spec:
minReplicas: 2
maxReplicas: 10
metrics:
- type: Resource
resource:
name: cpu
target:
averageUtilization: 70
βοΈ Pulumi (IaC)¶
Use Pulumi to automate infrastructure provisioning:
import * as k8s from "@pulumi/kubernetes";
const appLabels = { app: "gateway" };
const deployment = new k8s.apps.v1.Deployment("gateway", {
spec: {
selector: { matchLabels: appLabels },
replicas: 3,
template: {
metadata: { labels: appLabels },
spec: {
containers: [{
name: "gateway",
image: "registry/connectsoft-gateway:latest",
ports: [{ containerPort: 5000 }]
}]
}
}
}
});
Info
ConnectSoft's Pulumi automation includes gateway, microservices, observability stack, and ingress controller by default.
π§© Custom Middleware Extensibility¶
The gatewayβs internal pipeline supports middleware injection at any layer:
app.UseMiddleware<RequestRoutingMiddleware>();
app.UseMiddleware<JwtValidationMiddleware>();
app.UseMiddleware<TenantContextResolver>();
app.UseMiddleware<ObservabilityEnricherMiddleware>();
π‘ Common Middleware Extensions¶
| Use Case | Middleware Class |
|---|---|
| Add headers (e.g. version) | HeaderInjectionMiddleware |
| Geo-block traffic | GeoRestrictionMiddleware |
| Dynamic A/B routing | CanaryRoutingMiddleware |
| Multi-edition auth policy | EditionGuardMiddleware |
| Request time limit | RequestTimeoutMiddleware |
public class HeaderInjectionMiddleware
{
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context, RequestDelegate next)
{
context.Response.Headers.Add("X-Api-Version", "1.0");
await next(context);
}
}
π§ͺ CI/CD Integration¶
CI/CD-ready templates support:
- β
Azure Pipelines (
azure-pipelines.yml) - β
GitHub Actions (
.github/workflows/deploy.yml) - β Docker + Helm + Pulumi deploy stages
- β Pre-flight health checks + tracing verification
GitHub Actions sample:
jobs:
deploy:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout
uses: actions/checkout@v2
- name: Build & Push
run: |
docker build -t connectsoft-gateway .
docker push registry/connectsoft-gateway
- name: Deploy via Pulumi
run: pulumi up --yes
β Deployment Best Practices¶
| Area | Best Practice |
|---|---|
| Config | Use appsettings.{env}.json and override with ENV vars or secret stores |
| Secrets | Inject via Azure Key Vault or Kubernetes Secrets |
| Scale | Enable HPA for autoscaling under high load |
| Rollback | Tag releases; support Helm or Pulumi rollback |
| Monitoring | Validate deploy success via /ready, /metrics, /trace |
| Automation | Use CI pipelines for build/test/deploy |
π§ͺ Real-World Use Cases and Patterns¶
The ConnectSoft API Gateway is used across a wide range of real-world architectures β from high-traffic SaaS platforms and e-commerce portals to AI orchestration and DevOps automation.
This section outlines patterns and applied examples of how the gateway operates in production environments.
π’ SaaS Platform Gateway (Multi-Tenant)¶
Scenario: Serve thousands of tenants with isolated access policies and feature toggles.
Responsibilities:
- Inject X-Tenant-Id based on token claim or subdomain
- Enforce per-tenant feature access
- Centralize observability and rate limits
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Gateway
participant IdentityService
participant TenantService
Client->>Gateway: Request with Bearer Token
Gateway->>IdentityService: Validate JWT
Gateway->>TenantService: Resolve tenant plan + context
Gateway->>Microservices: Forward with X-Tenant-Id
Tip
Multi-tenant resolution is modular and supports dynamic edition-level routing for different SLAs.
π E-Commerce Checkout Flow¶
Scenario: Handle real-time checkout with downstream services (order, inventory, billing).
Responsibilities:
- Route /api/checkout to a dedicated faΓ§ade endpoint
- Aggregate inventory, payment, and order status in one response
- Enforce rate limits on anonymous traffic
- Fallback to secondary payment gateway
graph TD
Client --> Gateway
Gateway --> OrderService
Gateway --> InventoryService
Gateway --> BillingService
Policy:
π₯ Healthcare System (B2B and PHI Access)¶
Scenario: Support secure access to patient data with compliance and auditing.
Responsibilities:
- Validate access tokens issued by Azure AD B2C or OpenIddict
- Inject user identity, role, and session metadata
- Enforce scope-based access (appointments:read, records:write)
- Full traceability for audit logs (PHI-level)
Headers Injected:
π€ AI Assistant Orchestration (Agents, Webhooks, Tracing)¶
Scenario: Use gateway to route AI prompts to orchestrators, kernel-based agents, or inference services.
Responsibilities:
- Route /ai/* requests to semantic kernel or inference engine
- Add headers for user language, persona, subscription tier
- Enable OpenTelemetry for tracing each step (e.g., embedding, planner, summarizer)
graph TD
UI --> Gateway
Gateway --> AIKernel
Gateway --> EmbeddingService
Gateway --> MemoryStore
Gateway --> LoggingService
Use Case Routes:
- /ai/respond
- /ai/infer/medical
- /ai/tools/image
βοΈ DevOps API Gateway for CI/CD Pipelines¶
Scenario: Internal gateway for interacting with secure build, deploy, and audit endpoints.
Responsibilities: - Authenticate internal agents with machine-scoped JWTs - Rate limit long-polling agents (webhooks, release triggers) - Route to deployment microservices (Terraform, Helm, Pulumi)
Example Pattern:
graph TD
BuildAgent --> Gateway
Gateway --> DeployService
Gateway --> AuditLog
Gateway --> ArtifactStore
Info
These internal gateways can run in isolated namespaces and enforce service-to-service policies using mTLS and RBAC.
π Backend for Frontend (BFF) Variant¶
Scenario: Mobile app needs single endpoint to pull user dashboard.
Responsibilities:
- Compose responses from multiple services (e.g., UserService, NotificationService, TasksService)
- Format response to mobile-specific schema
- Cache recent responses for burst load
Optimized for: - Low-latency mobile environments - Edge deployments (API Gateway + CDN) - App-specific API shaping
π§ Summary of Common Gateway Patterns¶
| Pattern | Description |
|---|---|
| Multi-Tenant Gateway | Auth + tenant resolution + scoped rate limits |
| API Composition | Aggregate multiple downstream calls into one response |
| FaΓ§ade Endpoint | Abstract and secure a service (e.g., checkout, billing) |
| AI Pipeline Proxying | Route and trace GPT/embedding flows |
| mTLS Internal Gateway | Service-to-service calls inside protected mesh |
| BFF / Aggregator Gateway | Deliver frontend/mobile optimized APIs |
| Low-Traffic Public Gateway | Edge proxy with static caching, fallback + quota control |
π§© Best Practices for API Gateway in ConnectSoft¶
| Area | Best Practice |
|---|---|
| Authentication | Validate JWTs early at the gateway; propagate user/tenant metadata downstream |
| Authorization | Enforce role/scope at the gateway level, not just in services |
| Tenant Context | Resolve tenant from claims, headers, or route; inject into every request |
| Observability | Always enrich logs, traces, and metrics with correlation IDs and tenant IDs |
| Routing & Composition | Prefer simple forwarding; compose responses only when necessary (BFF pattern) |
| Rate Limiting & Quotas | Rate limit at gateway, separate by authentication type (free vs. paid) |
| Resilience | Implement retries + circuit breakers; fail gracefully with fallback responses |
| Configuration Management | Use environment-specific settings, injected secrets, and structured config |
| Extensibility | Add middleware for custom policies, diagnostics, and dynamic routing |
| Security Compliance | Sanitize all incoming headers; terminate TLS at the gateway boundary |
| Deployment | Use Helm, Pulumi, and CI/CD pipelines for repeatable, observable deployments |
| Scaling | Auto-scale API Gateway independently from backend services |
π§ Conclusion¶
The ConnectSoft API Gateway is not a generic reverse proxy β it is a purpose-built, production-grade solution tailored for:
- π’ Multi-tenant SaaS Platforms
- π E-commerce systems
- π₯ Healthcare and regulated environments
- π€ AI orchestration and inference pipelines
- βοΈ Internal DevOps automation
By centralizing routing, authentication, tenant resolution, rate limiting, and observability β
the gateway decouples client access from service architecture, improves security and performance, and empowers scalability across any cloud or hybrid infrastructure.
Every ConnectSoft microservice, SaaS edition, and platform integration relies on the consistent, modular, and observable behavior provided by the Gateway.
π‘ ConnectSoft Principle:
"The Gateway is not just the system's front door β it is its first layer of trust, control, and insight."
With built-in support for OpenTelemetry, structured logging, distributed tracing, dynamic resilience policies, and custom extension points, the ConnectSoft API Gateway ensures that every system remains secure, scalable, auditable, and evolution-ready.
π References and Related Documents¶
π Core ConnectSoft Documentation¶
- Microservices Architecture
- Clean Architecture
- Observability and Monitoring
- Identity and Access Control
- Security Best Practices
- Resiliency Patterns
- CI/CD Automation