π οΈ API Design and Management¶
APIs are the backbone of modern platforms, powering communication between services, frontend clients, third-party integrators, and infrastructure. In a distributed system β whether microservices, serverless, or event-driven β clean, secure, and observable APIs are critical to scalability and maintainability.
Info
At ConnectSoft, APIs are treated as first-class assets β carefully designed, documented, secured, and evolved across every platform, SaaS solution, microservice, and AI system.
Our approach ensures that APIs are not just technical endpoints, but reliable contracts, enforceable policies, and scalable products that enable integration, innovation, and growth at every layer.
At ConnectSoft, API design is not an afterthought β it's a first-class design activity embedded into our platform templates, domain modeling process, and deployment pipelines.
π Introduction¶
A well-designed API is more than just a contract between systems. It reflects domain intent, enforces security boundaries, and delivers a developer experience that scales across teams and integrations.
The ConnectSoft API strategy integrates with:
- π§± Domain-Driven Design (DDD)
- π§ͺ Test-First Use Cases
- π Automated CI/CD and versioning
- π Built-in authentication, tenant resolution, and scope policies
- π Observability via OpenTelemetry and structured logs
- π§ Event-based and request-based communication models
APIs are the primary surface through which value is delivered to platforms, partners, and customers.
π§ API Design Objectives¶
| Objective | ConnectSoft Perspective |
|---|---|
| Clarity | APIs reflect domain models and are self-explanatory in naming and behavior |
| Security | Authentication and authorization are enforced at the edge and service layers |
| Extensibility | APIs support optional fields, versioning, and evolution without breaking clients |
| Observability | Every request is traceable, measurable, and audit-logged |
| Governance | Contract-first, versioned, testable, and policy-driven |
| Developer UX | APIs are discoverable, documented, testable, and mockable |
π§ API Types in ConnectSoft Systems¶
ConnectSoft solutions use a mix of API interaction styles depending on use case, latency requirements, and client needs:
| API Type | Description | Typical Use |
|---|---|---|
| REST | Stateless HTTP API with resource-based modeling | CRUD operations, external integrations |
| GraphQL | Declarative API with client-driven query shape | Mobile apps, multi-platform frontends |
| gRPC | High-performance protocol using HTTP/2 and Protobuf | Internal service-to-service comms |
| Webhooks | Server-to-client event notifications | 3rd-party integrations, async updates |
| Event APIs | Publish-subscribe or queue-based models | Decoupled workflows, cross-service events |
π Example: Multi-Protocol Architecture¶
graph TD
WebApp -->|REST| Gateway
MobileApp -->|GraphQL| Gateway
Gateway -->|gRPC| InventoryService
Gateway -->|gRPC| OrderService
InventoryService -->|Events| Kafka
OrderService -->|Events| Kafka
PartnerSystem -->|Webhooks| Gateway
Tip
Each ConnectSoft platform includes templates to generate REST, GraphQL, and gRPC endpoints out-of-the-box, with authentication and observability pre-wired.
π API Design Principles¶
ConnectSoft APIs follow industry-leading design principles reinforced by code templates and architectural linting:
β Consistency¶
- Use plural nouns for collections:
/products,/orders - Use nouns + subresources:
/users/{id}/settings - Standardize on lowercase with hyphens for paths:
/tenant-invitations
β Clarity¶
- Avoid ambiguous verbs: use
POST /orders/submitonly if it represents a domain action - Always return structured responses (no raw strings or booleans)
β HTTP Semantics¶
GET= readPOST= createPUT= replacePATCH= partial updateDELETE= remove
β Semantic Errors¶
- Use error envelopes with machine-readable codes and human-readable messages
β Pagination and Filtering¶
- Use standard query params:
GET /products?limit=25&offset=0GET /users?email=alice@example.com
π§± Contract-First Design¶
At ConnectSoft, API design is done before implementation, using structured contracts and testable specs.
OpenAPI Example:
openapi: 3.0.0
info:
title: Subscription API
version: 1.0.0
paths:
/subscriptions:
post:
summary: Create a subscription
requestBody:
required: true
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/NewSubscription'
responses:
'201':
description: Created
Workflow:
- Define OpenAPI contract (
*.yaml) - Commit to
/Contracts/folder in Git - Generate DTOs and controllers via template
- Validate with contract tests (Pact or SpecFlow)
- Wire into CI/CD pipeline
π§ API Design Fundamentals¶
API design is not only about exposing functionality β it's about expressing domain meaning, preserving contract stability, and guiding how consumers interact with the system.
In ConnectSoft, every API must be predictable, evolvable, and observable. To ensure this, we apply several core principles across all design layers.
π Resource Modeling¶
APIs should model real-world concepts using nouns and their relationships. Avoid designing around internal DB tables or low-level entities.
β Good Example¶
β Anti-Example¶
Tip
Use RESTful URIs and standard verbs. Behavior-specific commands can still exist, but they should represent domain actions (/orders/{id}/cancel).
π¦ Resource Relationships¶
Model nested resources only when there is clear ownership or containment.
| Use Case | Recommended URI |
|---|---|
| Userβs settings | /users/{id}/settings |
| Orderβs items | /orders/{id}/items |
| Shared resource | /invoices/{id} |
π§ͺ Input Validation and Schema Standards¶
Validate incoming payloads at the API boundary, close to the controller level, using schemas (OpenAPI), attribute-based validation, or FluentValidation.
Example: FluentValidation Rule
ConnectSoft APIs use auto-generated Swagger from annotated DTOs and validation middleware to ensure unified behavior.
π§± Response Structure¶
Every response, success or error, should be wrapped in a predictable envelope. This helps frontend and third-party clients parse, handle, and log responses systematically.
Success Envelope
{
"data": {
"orderId": "abc123",
"status": "processing"
},
"meta": {
"timestamp": "2024-04-25T10:00:00Z",
"correlationId": "xyz-789"
}
}
Error Envelope
{
"error": {
"code": "invalid_email_format",
"message": "The email address is not valid.",
"field": "email"
}
}
Tip
Error responses should always include a machine-readable code, an optional field, and a human-friendly message.
π¨ Standardized Error Handling with Problem Details and Exception Mapping¶
At ConnectSoft, every API error response must comply with the Problem Details format defined in RFC7807.
Errors are translated automatically from domain exceptions into structured, traceable responses β improving consistency, developer experience, and observability.
Info
Exception mapping to Problem Details is applied across the entire platform.
Custom domain exceptions, validation errors, and infrastructure issues are surfaced with rich metadata, without leaking internal details.
π Problem Details Standard at ConnectSoft¶
Example API error response:
{
"type": "https://docs.connectsoft.io/errors/order_already_shipped",
"title": "Order Cannot Be Cancelled",
"status": 409,
"detail": "The order has already been shipped and cannot be cancelled.",
"instance": "/orders/12345",
"correlationId": "c123-xyz",
"tenantId": "tenant-456",
"errorCode": "ORDER_ALREADY_SHIPPED"
}
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
Link to documentation about the specific error |
title |
Human-readable summary of the error |
status |
HTTP status code |
detail |
Additional contextual details |
instance |
Request URI that caused the problem |
correlationId |
ConnectSoft traceability (same as request logs) |
tenantId |
ConnectSoft tenant context |
errorCode |
Internal domain-specific classification |
π οΈ Exception to ProblemDetails Mapping¶
Instead of manually handling exceptions everywhere, ConnectSoft uses global exception mapping middleware.
Each domain exception is mapped to an appropriate Problem Details object automatically.
Example: Custom Domain Exceptions
public class OrderAlreadyShippedException : DomainException
{
public OrderAlreadyShippedException(Guid orderId)
: base($"Order {orderId} has already been shipped.") { }
}
Global Exception Handler (ProblemDetails Middleware Extension):
app.UseExceptionHandler(config =>
{
config.Run(async context =>
{
var exception = context.Features.Get<IExceptionHandlerFeature>()?.Error;
var problem = MapExceptionToProblemDetails(exception, context);
context.Response.StatusCode = problem.Status ?? (int)HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError;
context.Response.ContentType = "application/problem+json";
await context.Response.WriteAsJsonAsync(problem);
});
});
static ProblemDetails MapExceptionToProblemDetails(Exception exception, HttpContext context)
{
return exception switch
{
OrderAlreadyShippedException ex => new ProblemDetails
{
Type = "https://docs.connectsoft.io/errors/order_already_shipped",
Title = "Order Cannot Be Cancelled",
Detail = ex.Message,
Status = StatusCodes.Status409Conflict,
Instance = context.Request.Path,
Extensions =
{
["correlationId"] = context.TraceIdentifier,
["tenantId"] = context.User.FindFirst("tenant_id")?.Value,
["errorCode"] = "ORDER_ALREADY_SHIPPED"
}
},
ValidationException ex => new ValidationProblemDetails(ex.Errors)
{
Type = "https://docs.connectsoft.io/errors/validation_failed",
Title = "Validation Failed",
Status = StatusCodes.Status400BadRequest,
Instance = context.Request.Path,
Extensions =
{
["correlationId"] = context.TraceIdentifier,
["tenantId"] = context.User.FindFirst("tenant_id")?.Value,
["errorCode"] = "VALIDATION_FAILED"
}
},
_ => new ProblemDetails
{
Type = "https://docs.connectsoft.io/errors/internal_server_error",
Title = "Internal Server Error",
Detail = "An unexpected error occurred.",
Status = StatusCodes.Status500InternalServerError,
Instance = context.Request.Path,
Extensions =
{
["correlationId"] = context.TraceIdentifier
}
}
};
}
π Best Practices for Problem Details at ConnectSoft¶
| Practice | Description |
|---|---|
| Map each domain exception | Define a unique ProblemDetails type URL and errorCode |
| Include correlationId and tenantId | For full observability and traceability |
| Localize user-facing titles/messages | Especially for SaaS and multi-region platforms |
| Avoid leaking internal stack traces | Always sanitize error responses |
| Return ValidationProblemDetails for model errors | Include per-field errors dictionary |
π£ Example: Validation Error Response¶
{
"type": "https://docs.connectsoft.io/errors/validation_failed",
"title": "Validation Failed",
"status": 400,
"detail": "Request validation failed. See errors for details.",
"instance": "/subscriptions",
"errors": {
"email": ["The Email field is invalid."],
"quantity": ["Quantity must be greater than 0."]
},
"correlationId": "def-456",
"tenantId": "tenant-789",
"errorCode": "VALIDATION_FAILED"
}
π Why Problem Details Exception Mapping Matters¶
- π₯ Unified developer experience: All APIs behave consistently on errors
- π Observability: Errors can be traced instantly across systems via correlation IDs
- π§© Contract safety: Clients can parse errors predictably by
errorCode - π Security: Internal failures are hidden from clients, only meaningful context is surfaced
π§ Diagram: Exception to ProblemDetails Mapping Flow¶
sequenceDiagram
Client->>API Gateway: API Request
API Gateway->>Service: Forward Request
Service->>Service: Throw DomainException (e.g., OrderAlreadyShippedException)
Service-->>Exception Middleware: Capture Exception
Exception Middleware-->>ProblemDetails Mapper: Map Exception to ProblemDetails Response
ProblemDetails Mapper-->>API Gateway: Return ProblemDetails JSON
API Gateway-->>Client: 4xx or 5xx Structured ProblemDetails Response
π’ Versioning Strategy¶
API versions are mandatory at ConnectSoft β no versionless endpoints are allowed.
β Preferred: URI Versioning¶
- Easy to test, cache, and evolve
- Supported by all API gateways and proxies
Alternative: Header Versioning¶
- Cleaner URI
- Works well with client libraries or SDKs
Warning
Never mix versioning strategies within the same API surface. Choose one and apply consistently.
π¦ Field Evolution and Compatibility¶
APIs must evolve without breaking clients:
| Pattern | Rule |
|---|---|
| Add new fields | Safe (clients ignore unknown fields) |
| Remove existing fields | Breaking change (requires new version) |
| Change field meaning | Breaking (requires version change) |
| Add enum value | Breaking for some clients (must document and version if critical) |
Best Practice:
Add new optional fields, document clearly, and provide fallback behavior when absent.
π§± OpenAPI Style Conventions¶
All ConnectSoft APIs must define their contracts using OpenAPI 3.x. Style guidelines include:
| Element | Convention |
|---|---|
components |
Organized by schema/use case |
operationId |
Must match UseCase handler |
tags |
Reflect bounded context name |
enum |
Lowercase + underscore |
nullable |
Explicit (no hidden nulls) |
Example: Schema Block
components:
schemas:
OrderStatus:
type: string
enum: [pending, processing, shipped, delivered, cancelled]
π Pagination and Filtering¶
Paginated endpoints must support:
limit(default: 25, max: 100)offsetorcursortotalCountin response metadata
Paginated Response Format
Filtering should follow consistent query syntax:
β Best Practices Summary¶
| Category | Guideline |
|---|---|
| URIs | Use nouns, plural form, avoid verbs |
| Verbs | Use standard HTTP methods |
| Naming | Consistent casing and terminology across API |
| Validation | Use schema validation with clear error messages |
| Responses | Always structured in envelopes with metadata |
| Versioning | Prefer URI versioning, be explicit and predictable |
| Pagination | Implement limit/offset with consistent metadata |
| Contracts | Use OpenAPI and commit .yaml files to source with lint rules |
π§© API Architecture Patterns and Integration Styles¶
Different application layers and client types require different API integration styles. At ConnectSoft, we use a mix of REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and event-driven interfaces β with each carefully selected for the scenario.
π§ Choosing the Right Integration Style¶
| Pattern | When to Use | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| REST | Simple CRUD, public APIs, predictable clients | Cacheable, well-known |
| GraphQL | UI-driven apps, mobile apps, bandwidth-constrained clients | Query shaping, flexible |
| gRPC | Internal service-to-service comms, low-latency, typed interactions | High performance |
| Webhooks | Third-party notifications, async responses | Must support retries |
| Events | Distributed workflows, eventual consistency, decoupled services | Pub/Sub or queues |
πΈοΈ REST at ConnectSoft¶
REST is used as the default API layer for:
- Public client APIs
- Admin portals
- Tenant management
- Settings and configuration
Each REST API follows standard ConnectSoft rules:
- GET /resource
- POST /resource
- PATCH /resource/{id}
- DELETE /resource/{id}
Response Example
π§ GraphQL APIs¶
GraphQL is used in systems where flexible querying and UI adaptation is critical, e.g.:
- π± Mobile and tablet clients
- π¦ Multilingual SaaS interfaces
- π Embedded dashboards and analytics
Query Example
ConnectSoft Enhancements:
- Schema registered at
/graphqlendpoint - Introspection disabled in production
- Role/Scope guards per field and resolver
- Observability and tracing via Apollo plugins
βοΈ gRPC Services¶
gRPC is used for internal service-to-service communication:
- π§Ύ Billing
- π§ AI Inference engines
- π Real-time status propagation
- π Analytics workers
Proto Example:
Tip
gRPC endpoints are documented in .proto files and compiled into internal SDKs via Grpc.Tools.
π£ Webhooks and Callbacks¶
Used for:
- User provisioning in external systems
- Payment notifications
- Partner system integrations
Example Event Flow
sequenceDiagram
ServiceA->>PartnerSystem: POST /webhook/user_created
PartnerSystem-->>ServiceA: 200 OK
Security Practices:
- Signed payloads with HMAC or shared secrets
- Retries with exponential backoff
- Idempotency tokens
π§ Event-Driven APIs (Pub/Sub)¶
Used in ConnectSoft for:
- Inventory events
- Appointment scheduling notifications
- Email/SMS events
- Audit trails and change data capture (CDC)
Event Format (JSON)
{
"event": "inventory_updated",
"data": {
"productId": "abc123",
"quantity": 42
},
"timestamp": "2024-04-25T12:00:00Z"
}
Published to:
- Azure Event Grid
- Kafka
- RabbitMQ topics
π Backend-for-Frontend (BFF)¶
In mobile-first platforms, ConnectSoft uses BFF gateways that expose:
- Aggregated user dashboard views
- Tenant-scoped search results
- Profile + preference + permissions in one call
Example Flow
sequenceDiagram
MobileApp->>BFF: GET /dashboard
BFF->>UserService: GET /user/123
BFF->>PermissionsService: GET /user/123/roles
BFF->>FeatureService: GET /user/123/features
BFF-->>MobileApp: JSON Aggregated Response
βοΈ Orchestration vs. Choreography¶
ποΈ Orchestration¶
A central orchestrator coordinates all interactions.
Use Case: Subscription provisioning flow.
graph TD
Orchestrator --> UserService
Orchestrator --> SubscriptionService
Orchestrator --> EmailService
πΌ Choreography¶
Each service listens and reacts to domain events.
Use Case: Order shipping flow.
graph TD
OrderPlaced --> Inventory
OrderPlaced --> Billing
OrderPlaced --> Notification
| Comparison | Orchestration | Choreography |
|---|---|---|
| Control Flow | Centralized | Decentralized |
| Coupling | Tighter | Looser |
| Observability | Easier to trace | Requires event tracing |
| Fault Tolerance | Single point of failure risk | More resilient |
π§° Integration Guidance¶
| Pattern | Tools / Tech Stack |
|---|---|
| REST | ASP.NET Core, Swagger/OpenAPI |
| GraphQL | HotChocolate, StrawberryShake, Apollo |
| gRPC | Grpc.AspNetCore, Protobufs |
| Webhooks | ASP.NET Controllers, Polly, Redis Queue |
| Pub/Sub Events | MassTransit, Azure Service Bus, Kafka |
π API Versioning and Lifecycle Evolution¶
APIs are long-lived assets. Over time, they evolve to support new features, security requirements, or performance optimizations. At ConnectSoft, API evolution is planned, documented, and communicated carefully to avoid breaking consumer applications.
π§± Versioning Strategies¶
URI Versioning (Recommended)¶
- Advantages:
- Explicit
- Easy to test and cache
- Supported by gateways, proxies, and OpenAPI
Header-Based Versioning (Optional)¶
- Advantages:
- Clean URLs
- Disadvantages:
- Harder to debug
- Requires strict documentation and SDK compliance
Query Parameter Versioning (Discouraged)¶
- Often ambiguous and less cache-friendly
Tip
All APIs must start versioned at /v1/. Never expose unversioned public endpoints.
π Breaking Changes: What Counts?¶
| Change Type | Breaking? | Requires New Version? |
|---|---|---|
| Add optional field | β | No |
| Rename or remove field | β | Yes |
| Change field meaning | β | Yes |
| Modify enum values | β οΈ | Yes (if clients validate enums) |
| Change status codes | β | Yes |
π§ Deprecation Policies¶
ConnectSoft enforces a deprecation lifecycle that is visible, communicated, and controlled.
Process¶
- Announce deprecation (documentation, changelogs)
- Add Sunset header to responses
- Monitor usage via observability layer
- Fully disable after transition window
Example Sunset Header¶
π Backward Compatibility Rules¶
To evolve safely, APIs must:
- Handle unknown fields gracefully
- Avoid renaming or removing fields mid-version
- Provide default values for newly added fields
- Introduce optional fields as non-breaking changes
- Expose
x-connectsoft-versionin headers for diagnostics
Compatible Schema Change
π§ͺ Test for Version Compatibility¶
Use automated tests in CI pipelines:
- Regression suite using contract-based test tools (e.g. Pact, Postman, SpecFlow)
- Backward compatibility tests per version (
/v1,/v2) - Traffic replay tools to simulate production payloads
π Semantic Versioning (SemVer) for APIs¶
Apply SemVer concepts to API design:
v1.0.0: Stable initial releasev1.1.0: Add non-breaking functionalityv2.0.0: Introduce breaking changes
ConnectSoft publishes API changelogs with semantically versioned diffs:
[Added] New /v1/invoices/bulk endpoint
[Deprecated] /v1/payments/{id}/refund moved to /v2/payments/refund
[Fixed] Bug in pagination metadata rounding logic
π£ Communicating Changes¶
| Channel | Purpose |
|---|---|
OpenAPI description |
Inline changes and guidance |
| Changelog.md | Track additions, fixes, removals |
| Email / Portal Notices | Notify integrators of sunset schedules |
| SDK Release Notes | Alert consuming apps of interface changes |
π¦ ConnectSoft Versioning Best Practices¶
| Practice | Description |
|---|---|
| β Start at v1 | Always version public APIs from the start |
| β Never break consumers silently | Changes must go through formal versioning |
β
Use Sunset headers |
Signal upcoming deprecations in all responses |
| β Maintain parallel versions | Run /v1 and /v2 concurrently during transition |
| β Avoid versionless webhooks | Even callback APIs should indicate version context |
π§° Tools for Version Management¶
| Tool / Process | Usage |
|---|---|
| Swagger/OpenAPI | Document each version separately |
| Postman | Organize environments by API version |
| Azure API Management | Route versions and enforce sunset via policies |
| Git Contracts Folder | Store each OpenAPI spec per version in source control |
| Changelog Generators | Automatically diff versions for client consumption |
π Evolution Workflow¶
graph TD
Plan[Plan Change] --> Define[Define Contract]
Define --> Version[Version Resource or Path]
Version --> Deprecate[Mark Old Version with Sunset]
Deprecate --> Monitor[Monitor Usage]
Monitor --> Sunset[Disable After Sunset Date]
π API Security and Threat Protection¶
Security is non-negotiable in modern API-driven systems. At ConnectSoft, every exposed API β public or internal β is protected by defense-in-depth mechanisms, including strict authentication, scope-based authorization, tenant validation, and traffic filtering.
π§Ύ Authentication Strategies¶
| Method | Description | Usage in ConnectSoft |
|---|---|---|
| OAuth2 | Standard token-based auth flow | Browser apps, mobile, third-party integrations |
| JWT | Compact, signed tokens with claims | Default bearer tokens in all APIs |
| API Keys | Simple keys passed in header | Internal automation, limited-scope scripts |
| mTLS | Mutual TLS, certificate-based auth | Service-to-service in restricted environments |
Example: OAuth2 Access Token (JWT)
JWT Validation Middleware:
services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddJwtBearer(options =>
{
options.Authority = "https://auth.connectsoft.io";
options.Audience = "connectsoft-api";
});
π§βπ€βπ§ Tenant-Aware Authorization¶
All ConnectSoft APIs are multi-tenant by default. Authorization is enforced via:
- Scopes and roles encoded in JWTs
- Tenant context extracted from claims or headers
- API gateway middleware that injects
X-Tenant-Idheaders
Authorization Flow:
sequenceDiagram
Client->>API Gateway: Authenticated Request (JWT)
API Gateway->>AuthService: Validate JWT, resolve scopes
API Gateway->>Service: Forward request + X-Tenant-Id header
Service->>AuthorizationHandler: Check role/scope for tenant
π― Scope-Based Access Control¶
ConnectSoft uses a scope-based permission model for fine-grained access control:
| Scope | Description |
|---|---|
orders:read |
Read-only access to orders |
orders:write |
Create or update orders |
admin:manage |
Full administrative control |
billing:approve |
Approve billing workflows |
Scope Enforcement Snippet:
Scopes are validated at both the gateway and the application level.
π§± Threat Mitigation Patterns¶
π‘οΈ Input Validation¶
- Enforce schema-level validation for all inbound requests
- Reject unknown or unexpected fields
- Use library-based validation (FluentValidation, Data Annotations)
π§ SQL Injection Defense¶
- Always use parameterized queries
- Avoid raw SQL construction via string interpolation
π Encryption in Transit and at Rest¶
- Enforce HTTPS (TLS 1.2+)
- Use Azure Key Vault or managed cloud secrets
- AES-256 encryption for sensitive fields
π Rate Limiting and Throttling¶
ConnectSoft gateways enforce tiered quota enforcement:
| User Type | Requests/Minute | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | 60 | Soft limited with burst |
| Premium Tier | 1000 | Higher quota, fair queue |
| Internal Bots | Unlimited (scoped) | Identified by service token |
Gateway Policy Example (Kong YAML):
π¨ DDoS and Abuse Prevention¶
| Technique | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Geo-blocking | Block regions not in target market |
| IP Filtering | Deny suspicious or internal IPs |
| Bot Detection | Challenge requests with high error rate |
| Cloud Shields | Use Azure DDoS Protection, AWS Shield |
π Auditing and Log Correlation¶
All security-critical events are logged with:
- User ID
- Tenant ID
- Token ID or fingerprint
- Correlation ID
- Action and resource path
Log Entry Example (JSON):
{
"timestamp": "2024-04-25T14:00:00Z",
"action": "update_user",
"userId": "u-123",
"tenantId": "t-456",
"correlationId": "abc-789",
"status": "success"
}
β Security Best Practices Summary¶
| Area | Practice |
|---|---|
| π Authentication | Use OAuth2 with signed JWTs |
| π§βπ€βπ§ Multi-Tenancy | Validate tenant and inject into all downstream service calls |
| π Scopes | Apply least-privilege access model |
| π§ͺ Input Validation | Use schema, size, format, and enum validation |
| π Encryption | TLS for all transport, AES-256 for sensitive fields |
| π¦ Rate Limiting | Enforce quotas by user tier and token scope |
| π§Ύ Auditing | Log every action with traceability metadata |
| π§± API Gateway Rules | Strip dangerous headers, limit payload size, enforce allowed methods |
π API Observability and Monitoring¶
In ConnectSoft systems, APIs are built to be observable from day one.
Visibility into API behavior enables performance optimization, security auditing, incident detection, and system evolution.
Observability spans across:
- π Structured Logging
- π Metrics Collection
- πΈοΈ Distributed Tracing
- π£ Alerting and Incident Response
π Structured Logging¶
Every ConnectSoft API generates structured logs in a machine-readable JSON format, enriched with:
- Timestamps
- Correlation IDs
- Tenant IDs
- User IDs (when applicable)
- Route and method
- Status codes
- Execution duration
Log Example:
{
"timestamp": "2025-04-25T10:15:30Z",
"correlationId": "c123-abc",
"tenantId": "tenant-789",
"userId": "user-456",
"method": "GET",
"path": "/v1/orders/123",
"statusCode": 200,
"latencyMs": 120
}
Best Practices:
| Practice | Notes |
|---|---|
| Use correlation IDs | Trace entire request flow across services |
| Mask sensitive fields | Never log passwords, secrets, tokens |
| Capture structured JSON | Avoid free-text logs; use log templates |
π Metrics Collection¶
Metrics help detect issues before they become incidents.
| Metric | Purpose | Example Tool |
|---|---|---|
Request Rate (http_requests_total) |
Throughput monitoring | Prometheus |
Latency (http_request_duration_seconds) |
Detect performance regressions | Grafana |
Error Rate (http_errors_total) |
Detect spikes in failures | Prometheus |
| Saturation Metrics | Monitor CPU/memory, DB pool saturation | Azure Monitor |
Example Prometheus Query:
Service-Level Objectives (SLOs):
- 95% of requests under 400ms latency
- Error rate <1% over a rolling 1-hour window
πΈοΈ Distributed Tracing (OpenTelemetry)¶
Tracing provides full request visibility across microservices, message queues, databases, and external APIs.
Trace Data Captures:
- Span duration
- Service-to-service hops
- Error annotations
- Tenant-specific metadata
Trace Example Flow:
sequenceDiagram
Client->>API Gateway: API Request (correlationId: abc123)
API Gateway->>OrderService: Forwarded Request
OrderService->>InventoryService: Check Stock
InventoryService-->>OrderService: Stock Confirmed
OrderService-->>API Gateway: Order Placed
API Gateway-->>Client: 201 Created
Toolchain:
- OpenTelemetry SDK in all APIs
- Trace export to Jaeger or Azure Application Insights
- Context propagation (traceparent, baggage headers)
ποΈ Alerting and Incident Response¶
Automated alerts based on metric thresholds ensure proactive incident management.
| Alert Type | Trigger Condition | Action |
|---|---|---|
| High Error Rate | >1% error responses over 5 minutes | Trigger PagerDuty escalation |
| Latency Spike | >500ms p95 for a critical route | Slack alert + ticket creation |
| API Saturation | CPU >85% or DB Pool Exhaustion | Auto-scale instance, inform ops |
| Deprecation Breach | Traffic to deprecated API version after sunset date | Block and alert compliance team |
Example Alert Configuration (Prometheus Rule):
groups:
- name: APIAlerts
rules:
- alert: HighRequestLatency
expr: histogram_quantile(0.95, sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])) by (le)) > 0.5
for: 5m
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "High latency detected on API"
π§° Observability Tools Stack¶
| Area | Recommended Tool |
|---|---|
| Logging | Serilog β ElasticSearch β Kibana |
| Metrics | Prometheus β Grafana |
| Tracing | OpenTelemetry β Jaeger or Azure Monitor |
| Incident Management | PagerDuty, Opsgenie, Azure Alerts |
π ConnectSoft Observability Architecture¶
flowchart TD
API_Gateway -->|Structured Logs| LogAggregator
API_Gateway -->|Traces| TraceCollector
API_Gateway -->|Metrics| PrometheusServer
LogAggregator --> ElasticSearch
PrometheusServer --> Grafana
TraceCollector --> Jaeger
- π Logs centralized and searchable (ElasticSearch, Kibana)
- π Metrics visualized (Grafana)
- π΅οΈββοΈ Traces linked to correlation IDs across services (Jaeger, OpenTelemetry)
β Observability Best Practices¶
| Practice | Notes |
|---|---|
| Correlate logs, metrics, and traces | Use correlation IDs across the stack |
| Alert on symptoms, not just errors | Watch for latency increases, not just 500s |
| Dashboard everything | Visualize KPIs, error trends, and request distribution |
| Proactive incident playbooks | Define how to react to common types of alerts |
π Best Practices Recap¶
ConnectSoft enforces a disciplined and structured approach to API design, management, and evolution.
Hereβs a final recap of essential best practices applied across all projects:
π API Design¶
| Area | Practice |
|---|---|
| Resource Modeling | Use nouns, not verbs; reflect domain entities clearly |
| Consistency | Uniform naming, response structures, and HTTP semantics |
| Validation | Enforce input validation at the boundary |
| Error Handling | Use standard, structured error envelopes |
| Pagination & Filtering | Standardize query parameters, metadata structure |
| Versioning | Always expose versioned URIs from v1 onward |
| OpenAPI | Maintain contract-first OpenAPI specs per version |
π Security¶
| Area | Practice |
|---|---|
| Authentication | OAuth2 flows with signed JWTs |
| Authorization | Scope-based and tenant-aware access controls |
| Input Protection | Validate schemas, sizes, types, and ranges |
| Transport Security | TLS 1.2+ encryption enforced on all connections |
| Rate Limiting | Protect APIs with tiered quotas and burst management |
| Auditing | Log all sensitive activities with correlation IDs |
π Observability¶
| Area | Practice |
|---|---|
| Structured Logging | JSON logs with rich metadata (tenantId, userId, latency) |
| Metrics | Request rates, error rates, latency, resource saturation |
| Distributed Tracing | Correlate all service hops with OpenTelemetry |
| Alerting | Proactive incident detection via metrics and thresholds |
π Evolution¶
| Area | Practice |
|---|---|
| Semantic Versioning | Major.Minor.Patch semantics for API releases |
| Deprecation | Sunset headers and announced migration paths |
| Contract Testing | Automated verification of backward compatibility |
| Changelog Discipline | Detailed, structured changelogs for consumers |
π§ Final Conclusion¶
APIs are not simply endpoints β they are contracts, policies, and products.
At ConnectSoft, our approach to API design and management ensures:
- Interoperability across distributed systems
- Security by enforcing defense-in-depth patterns
- Scalability to support millions of interactions daily
- Observability for real-time monitoring, auditability, and evolution
- Developer Experience that accelerates integration and platform adoption
Good API design is a long-term investment: every good decision made at the design phase saves 10Γ effort in scaling, securing, and maintaining complex systems later.
"An API is your handshake to the world. Design it with clarity, secure it with trust, and manage it with wisdom."
π References¶
π Core ConnectSoft Resources¶
- Architecture Overview
- Microservices Best Practices
- API Gateway Design
- Security and Identity Management
- Observability and Monitoring
- Software Development Lifecycle